Watching for Catholic signs of the Apocalypse- Apostasy, Heresy, and Demons. (Apostasy is the rejection or abandonment of one's faith.) I love the Catholic Faith, but our religion was hi-jacked 59 years ago, when Cardinal Siri was 'encouraged to resign', immediately after being elected Pope, in 1958. 

A Conversation with a Sedevacantist Priest about how he personally came to its truths, and the Theological arguments of where to go next. Watch, as an introduction, or if you can not read and absorb the long Open Letter , below.

An Open Letter to Good Catholics Everywhere
The Case for Sedevacantism

Sedevacantism is the position, held by a minority of traditionalist Catholics, that the alleged present occupant of the Holy See is not truly pope, due to the mainstream church's espousal of the heresy of modernism, and that, for lack of a valid pope, the Holy See has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958. Consequently, the Catholic Church we all know it, is no longer Catholic, we would be offending God severely and worshiping an idol, by attending Mass, the majority of Priests are merely lay people, and there is no real Presence in the Holy Eucharist!

The immediate question is: 'Did I just severely blaspheme God Almighty, and Condemn my Soul to Hell Forever, or did I just wake up to the last 50 years of outrageous Lies, Heresies, and Apostasy, from the consecutive string of Seven Heretical Popes?' This letter will be very long, because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I am merely a lifelong Catholic who fell away from the church in my late teens, and remained out of the church for 40 years. Eleven years ago, I found my faith again, and I have been trying to save as many other lapsed Catholics, as well as anyone else, who can see the light.

I suppose anyone who stumbles upon this letter, might assume that I am a 'church hater'. No, no, I love the church. I am trying to save it. Catholic Church teaching thru the centuries has taught that there would be tremendous Apostasy, in the last days.

Even the Church Catechism teaches that Apostasy would be the Church's enemy, in the last days. Apostasy is the abandonment or rejection of one's faith. It's happening now, and for the last 50 years, and at an alarming rate.

Good Catholics, who go to Mass every Sunday, have no idea that this is happening. I believe the following is very powerful stuff, and I have tried hard to assemble in one place, my best argument possible.


"Strive to enter through the narrow gate, ...And you will say, 'We ate and drank in Your company ..." [possibly at Mass!]

He [Jesus] passed through towns and villages, teaching as He went and making His way to Jerusalem.

Someone asked Him, "Lord, will only a few people be saved?"

He answered them,"Strive to enter through the narrow gate, for many, I tell you, will attempt to enter but will not be strong enough. After the Master of the House has arisen and locked the door, then you will stand outside knocking and saying, 'Lord, open the door for us.'

He will say to you in reply, 'I do not know where you are from.'

And you will say, 'We ate and drank in Your company and You taught in our streets.'

Then He will say to you, 'I do not know where [you] are from. Depart from me, all you evildoers!'

And there will be wailing and grinding of teeth when you see Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and all the prophets in the Kingdom of God, and yourselves cast out.

And people will come from the east and the west and from the north and the south and will recline at table in the Kingdom of God.

For behold, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last." (Luke 13:22-30)


"...members have been led quietly, unprotestingly, unknowingly..."

To quote Fr. Malachi Martin, Vatican Insider, and best selling author, on the Art Bell Radio Show, 1998, one year before Fr. Martin passed, talking about the previous 30 years of erosion of the true Catholic faith by the Popes, since 1958:

FR. MM: "So, you go on down the line, and you find that a good deal of these One Billion plus members have been led quietly, unprotestingly, unknowingly, into another form of belief, which is not Catholic."

AB: "Well then, one must ask, has the Vatican made an irreversible mistake? That's what you seem to be saying."

FR. MM: "Yes. The Vatican has made an irreversible mistake, as regards the structure of the Church, and as regards the way doctrine should be taught. ..."

AB: "If the changes as you've described, are irreversible within the Church, then where is the Church going?

FR. MM: "In one word- Underground.

AB: Underground?!

FR. MM: "Underground. Yes! The structure as it is, is creaking and groaning, and not carrying the weight, and there is springing up, in North America, and Latin America, and in Europe, a network of Catholics, Priests, Bishops, Nuns, [and] Laity, who are reviving all of the ancient teachings, and living by them, and refusing to co-operate with any they consider to be out-of-line, anyone they consider not being of the posit of the Faith, the Traditional Faith. Now to be awfully frank with you, Art, and to be frank with my fellow Catholics throughout the world, and at this moment, that network probably, what? About 10 million practicing out of One Billion. [That's 1%.] But it is most potent, and the best proof of its potency, and its power, and its promise, is the fact that it's hounded, and condemned, and exporiated, by the official drum of the Roman Catholic Church."

End of radio interview.


To summarize the most widespread Heresies of a string of popes, it is that of 'Baptism of Desire'. Namely that everyone goes to Heaven, from non-Catholics, including heretical sects, and established religions, to Atheists, and unaware and unknowing, uncivilized tribal people. Don't worry [about it], be happy!

The highest leadership of the Catholic Church has been infiltrated by Freemasonry, a secret society that has been an enemy of the Church for centuries, because of their long-stated goal of destroying the Roman Catholic Church.

The Catholic Faith is ultimately what Jesus has taught us, over the last 2,000 years. The unknowing, hi-jacked faithful now believe all the wrong things, instructed from on high by a succession of bad Popes, since 1958.

In 1962, abortion was illegal, movies were wholesome, porn was rare, and homosexuality was nearly unheard of! The following is a summary of Changes in the Beliefs of the Catholic Faithful, since about 1962:
In 2005, Catholics of various ages were asked if you can still be a 'good Catholic', without going to church on Sunday, by age group:
Age 65 and older: 69% agreed.
Age 45 to 64: 76% agreed.
Age 26 to 44: 87% agreed.
Age 18 to 25: 95% agreed.
In 2005, Catholics were asked if they had a 'high commitment' to the Catholic Church, by age group:
Age 65 and older: 43% agreed.
Age 45 to 64: 17% agreed.
Age 25 to 44: 8% agreed.
Age 18 to 24: 0% agreed.
In 1987, 39% of Catholics say you can be a 'good Catholic', and still have an Abortion.
By 2005, the number rose to 58%.
Since 1962, Co-habitation is Up over 1,000%
Rhode Island has the most Catholics per capita, in the U.S.
1969-2009 R.I. Overall Marriages were down 17%
1969-2009 R.I. Catholic Marriages fell 71%, from 4,452 to 1,300
In 1963, Out-of-Wedlock deliveries was 8%.
In 2002, it was up to 34%.
Can you still be a Good Catholic, get a Divorce, Remarry, and Receive Holy Communion? 65% say Yes.
Catholic Women who have used Contraception at some point in their lives? 98%
College age Catholics who hold more Truth in Catholicism, rather than any other religioin? 19%
Is Holy Communion merely a symbolic representation of the Last Supper, Age 18-25 Catholics? 70% say Yes.
A Survey of Elementary School Catholic Religious Teachers, (Lay & religious), was conducted in 2000, and they were asked if they agreed with Catholic Catechism, and Church Dogma.
Abortion- 74% disagree.
Infallibility of the Pope- 73% disagree.
Euthanasia- 69% disagree.
Only Male Priests- 67% disagree.
Contraception- 90% disagree.
Dissolvability of Marriage- 46% disagree.
Real presence in Holy Communion- 32% disagree.
Divinity of Jesus as the Son of God- 9% disagree.

To paraphrase the Bible, the Gate to Hell is wide, and the Path to Heaven is Narrow. We may have lost a large measure of a generation or two, of well-meaning Catholic Souls, by the following measures:

Seminarians are Down 90%
Ordinations are Down 71%
In 1965, there were 1,575 new Priests Ordained.
In 2002, there were 450.
Between 1965 and 2000, there were nearly 13 Priests per 10,000 Catholic Parishioners.
By 2002, there were only 7 Priests per 10,000 Catholic Parishioners, a drop of 46%.
Between 1965 and 2001, the number of Parishes with No Resident Priest, increased by 500%.
Since 1965, Nuns have fallen from 180,000 to 75,000
Of those Nuns, Teaching Nuns have fallen from 104,000 to 8,200, which is a drop of 94%.
A 1996 St. Louis University Survey showed that 9% of all Nuns were sexually exploited by a Priest, Nun, or other Religious person.
Since 1965, One-Half of all Catholic High Schools have closed.
In 1968, there were 338 Marriage Annulments.
In 2002, there were nearly 50,000.
Since 1962, the Prison Incarceration rate for U.S. Male Prisoners has risen Four-Fold, going from about 225 to 900, for every 100,000 population. The U.S. has 2.2 million prisoners, and China has only 1.5 Million. Even Russia's rate, second among large countries, is 2/3 of the U.S. rate.


The Devil's 100 year Reign
The Vision of Pope Leo 13th
October 13, 1884

Exactly 33 years to the day before the Great Miracle of the Sun, at the Church Approved Apparition at Fatima, Portugal, Pope Leo 13th had a remarkable vision on October 13, 1884. When the Pontiff finished saying Mass at his private Vatican Chapel, attended by a few Cardinals, and members of the Vatican Staff, he stopped at the foot of the altar. He stood there for about 10 minutes as if he was in a trance, and his face was ashen white. Then he went immediately to his office and composed a prayer to Saint Michael, and instructed that it be said after every low Mass everywhere.

When he was asked what had happened, he said that when he was about to leave the foot of the altar, he heard two voices. One voice was kind and gentle, and the other voice was guttural and harsh. He said that the two voices seemed to come from near the tabernacle. As he listened, he heard the following conversation:

The guttural voice of Satan, in his pride, boasted to Our Lord: "I can destroy your church".

The gentle voice of Our Lord said:
"You can? Then go ahead and do so."

Satan: "To do so, I need more time, and more power."

Our Lord: "How much time? How much power?"

Satan: "75-100 years, and a greater power over those who will give themselves over to my service."

Our Lord: "You have the time. You will have the power. Do with them what you will."

Most people believe that the 100 year Reign of the Devil started about 1914, with the start of WWl, while others suggest 1917, when Our Lady's apparition at Fatima was perhaps aligned to counteract it.


Sister Lucia, of Fatima, speaks of the Great Apostasy

The following information was transcribed from the YouTube Video by Sensus Fidelium entitled Fatima Mission 4: The Third Secret, an audio recording of a Priest's Lecture at a weekend Fatima Mission Retreat in the U. S.

In December of 1957, Sister Lucia told Fr. Fuentes, who was the vice Postulate for the cause of Blessed Francisco and Jacinta:

"Father, the Most Holy Virgin made me understand that we are in the Last Times, of the world. The Devil is in the mood for engaging in the most decisive battle against the Virgin-- the Final Battle. One side will be victorious, and the other side will suffer defeat. And the Devil knows what offends God the most, what will gain for him the greatest number of souls, in a short space of time. So he does everything to overcome Souls Consecrated to God, because in this way, the devil will succeed, leaving the souls of the faithful abandoned by their leaders, and thereby will the more easily, will he seize them."

"That which afflicts the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and the Heart of Jesus, is the fall of Religious and Priestly souls. The Devil knows that the Religious and Priests who fall away from their beautiful vocations, drag numerous souls to Hell. The Devil wishes to take possession of Consecrated Souls. He tries to corrupt them, in order to lull to sleep the souls of lay people, and thereby lead them to final repenitence. He deploys all tricks. He even goes so far as to suggest the delay of entrance into Religious life. Resulting from this is the sterility of the interior life, and among the lay people-- coldness, and a lack of enthusiasm regarding the subject of renouncing pleasures, and the total dedication of themselves to God."

"My mission is not to indicate to the world, the material punishments, which are certain to come, if the world does not pray or do penance beforehand. No. My mission is to indicate to everyone, the imminent danger we are all in, of loosing our souls for all eternity, if we remain obstinate in sin."

"Father, we should not wait for an appeal to the world, to come from Rome, on the part of the Holy Father, to do penance, nor should we wait for our call to penance to come from our Bishops in our Diocese, nor from the Religious Congregations. No. The Lord has already, very often, used these means, and the world has not paid attention. That's why now, it is necessary for each one of us to begin to reform himself spiritually. Each person must not only save his own soul, but also help to save all the souls that God has placed on our path."

[On another occasion], to someone asking about the content of the Third Secret, Sister Lucia said: "It's in the Gospel, and the Apocalypse. Read them!"

The lecture continues:
Based on the statements of Sister Lucia, we would expect Apocalyptic elements of the Third Secret. Not merely material chastisements, but also indicating disaster, corruption, Apostasy, in the ranks of the Priests and Religious, who will lead the laity [congregation] down the same paths. We know from her own testimony, that the Third Secret contains something so terrible that she would not be able to write it down without a Special Intervention of Our Lady.

We mentioned that, but, in fact, she received an order from the Bishop to write down the Third Secret. It took her more that two months, but she couldn't do it. And she said it wasn't due to natural causes, and she was unable to write it down until the Blessed virgin appeared to her on January 3rd, 1944, as we just heard, and told her it was God's Will.

Speaking of this difficulty, Father Alonso, who as the official archivist of Fatima, had unrestricted access to Sister Lucia and her writings, and he asked:

"How are we to understand Sister Lucia's great difficulty writing the final part of the Third Secret, when she had already written other things that were extremely difficult to put down? And had it been merely prophesying new and severe punishments, Sister Lucia would not have experienced difficulty, so great, that a Special Intervention from Heaven, was needed to overcome them. But, if it were a matter of Internal Strife within the Church, and of Serious Pastoral Negligence, on the part of high ranking members of the Hierarchy, we can understand how Lucia experienced the repugnance, that was almost impossible to overcome, by natural means."

The lecture continues: [100 year warning, and direct parallels]

In August of 1931, Our Lord spoke to Sister Lucia, and said:

"Make it known to my Ministers, given that following the example of the King of France in delaying the execution of my command, like him, they will fall into misfortune. It will never be too late to have recourse to Jesus and Mary."

Now for anyone that knows what Our Lord is referring to, there, that's really frightening.

On June 17th, 1689, Our Lord had commanded the King of France, through Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque, to Consecrate France to His Sacred Heart.

So we have the Apparitions of the Sacred Heart, you have the First Fridays, you have the request for the Consecration of the Sacred Heart.

It's parallel. The two situations are parallel.

We have the Apparitions of the Sacred Heart [of Mary at Fatima], we have the request for the Consecration of Her Immaculate Heart [to Russia]. We have the Five First Saturdays.


So Our Lord commanded the King of France to Consecrate His Sacred Heart [to France]. It's like Mary asked the Popes to Consecrate Russia to Her Immaculate Heart!

The King did nothing about it. In fact, for a full 100 years the Kings did nothing about it.

On June 17th, 1789, exactly 100 years from the day that Our Lord had asked for the Consecration of His Sacred Heart, the Third Estate [the common people], began the French Revolution, by declaring itself the National Assembly.

[The Storming of the Bastille occurred a month later, less three days, on July 14th]. Four years later, the King was publicly guillotined, and, as everybody knows, the French Revolution was a bloodbath.

The End


Noah was given 100 year warning.

Noah was about age 500, when he was instructed by God to build the Ark, and he was age 600, when the flood waters rose on the 17th day of the second month. He was only given one week to load all of the animals, and only one day to shut the door, excluding everyone except the eight family members on the Ark.

37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39 and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. (Matthew 24:37-39 NIV)

The 100 year anniversary of Fatima is approaching fast!

On July 13, 1917, Our Lady asked for the Pope to specifically Consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart, along with the assembled Bishops of the Church. Pope Pius 12th finally Consecrated Russia, but it was done more than 30 years late, and without the assembled Bishops. 

The End.

The Great Apostasy and a counterfeit Church were predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy.
See the section at the end of this Open Letter on that subject.


The controversial Papal Conclave to elect a new Pope, following the death of Pope Pius 12th, in October, 1958, probably marks the beginning of the Masonic/Protestant takeover of the Catholic Church. On October 26, 1958, white smoke emerged from the Vatican's chimney for 5 minutes, but no new Pope came out onto the balcony that night, as the Roman Catholic Church's new pope.

The following three italic paragraphs are from


It’s where all the official trouble began, it’s the one event that started it all: the conclave of October 1958, which met to elect a successor to Pope Pius XII [12th], and, after a great many ballots and some curious shenanigans, presented Cardinal Angelo Roncalli as “Pope” John XXIII [23rd] on Oct. 28.

What many people don’t know is that two days prior to Roncalli’s appearance as “Pope”, namely, on Oct. 26, white smoke rose from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel already. The Swiss guards were notified to prepare to welcome the soon-to-appear Pope, and Vatican Radio announced excitedly,

“There can be absolutely no doubt. A Pope has been elected!”

But no Pope ever stepped out on the balcony of St. Peter’s. The white smoke turned to gray, [after being white for five minutes], and confusion ensued. ...[There is] some circumstantial evidence, or clues, to the effect that Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, Archbishop of Genoa, was elected Pope and took the name Gregory XVII [17th].

We...[do] not [want] to make anyone believe that Cardinal Giusseppe Siri was actually Pope Pius 12th’s successor, but to make people aware of the mysterious goings-on at this conclave, to get people to investigate it, and to pinpoint the moment in Church history that appears to contain the cause of the Eclipse of the Catholic Church and the introduction of the Novus Ordo Religion and its false “Popes”. [Sunday night, at about 5:55 pm, local time,] October 26, 1958, is when all the trouble began; it is ground zero of the New Church.

The End.


Many believe that Cardinal Giusseppe Siri was elected Pope on the evening of October 26, 1958, but that his extensive family was immediately threatened, and Cardinal Siri quickly stepped down.

Renowned Papal Advisor and Jesuit Priest, Fr. Malachi Martin, has stated that:

"The truth is that Siri got sufficient votes twice to become Pope in two Conclaves, but he refused it. At least two, if not three-- but he refused it. And he made quite clear talking to us after those two Conclaves that yes, the votes were there, but he refused to take them. He refused to take them."

When Fr. Martin was asked why, he said:

"I think out of fear. I think his family was at stake. He was a Genoese family. They were fishermen originally, a very extensive family, and he felt there was too much physical and social danger for his family, if he bucked the system. And remember that, the two Conclaves I'm talking about are the Conclave of 1958, which elected John 23rd, and the Conclave of 1963, which elected Paul 6th. They were very political Conclaves."

Fr. Martin was then asked if Cardinal Siri refused because he thought that he couldn't be an effective pope? Fr. Martin responded:

"No, no," "He felt that they wouldn't let him live. They were bent --- remember the whole thing was planned --- they were bent on changing the Church. And they weren't going to allow Siri in, because everybody knew what Siri would do. He'd simply put on his coat of [chain]mail, he'd take his battle-ax, and go out and take off heads. Siri would never make a compromise, so I think he said, 'No I can't do that because my family would suffer,' and he had a large family, so he wouldn't do it."

The essential details of Fr. Martin's account are echoed in FBI consultant, Dr. Paul L. Williams, in his book, The Vatican Exposed, although he reports the reason why Cardinal Siri refused was because:

"...the French Cardinals annulled the results, claiming that the elections would result in widespread riots, and the assassination of Bishops behind the Iron Curtain."


What have these bad Popes, been teaching the faithful, since 1958?

The following information concerning the Popes, is from Bro. Michael Dimond and Bro. Peter Dimond (from the book The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II). The Dimond Brothers have specifically authorized the redistribution of their material, provided it includes their website link:


The Benedictine Order's special destiny, in the Last days:

The Benedictine Order of the Most Holy Family Monastery, and Brothers Michael and Peter Dimond of the Benedictine Order believe their YouTube videos are destined to assist the Catholic Church in the last days:

The first two, (of five), Promises made by St. Benedict, to his Benedictine Order, regarding the destiny of his Benedictine order, and that of its friends and enemies:

1) His order will continue to exist to the End of the World.
2) It will, at the End of the World, in the final battle, render great services to the holy Church and confirm many in the faith.


[I have eliminated most of the quotes from the Popes, because in many cases, there are just too many examples of Heresy and Apostasy, but the exact quotes can be found at:]


Pope John 23rd (1958-1963) [Angelo Roncalli]

In the end, Pope John XXIII was elected Pope, two days later, on October 28, 1962, and he called the Second Vatican Council, in 1962, in the third year of his reign, and initiated wide sweeping reforms in the Church, that opened the door to the Protestant Reformation of the Church! We'll start with Angelo Roncalli's early history:

* A. RONCALLI  Sought a close ASSOCIATION WITH AN EXCOMMUNICATED HERETIC, Ernesto Buonaiuti, in 1926, to form a "TRUE and UNIQUE CHURCH".


* A. RONCALLI  also became a 33rd DEGREE FREEMASON himself, while in Malta, and attended Thursday evenings of the Grand Orient [Masonic Lodge] of France, and participated in the work of the Istanbul Workshops.

* A. RONCALLI BECOMES CARDINAL, chose to receive his cardinal’s hat from notorious Anti-Catholic Vincent Auriol.

* JOHN 23rd HONORS PREVIOUS ANTI-POPE HIPPOLYTUS, an Anti-Pope of the 3rd century. He restored the statue and placed it at the entrance of the Vatican Library.

* JOHN 23rd published an encyclical on penance, proclaiming no fast nor even any obligatory day of abstinence from food or secular pleasures. John 23rd said of himself: “I’m the Pope who keeps stepping on the accelerator.” [meaning perhaps, that he was fully aware of his responsibility as the first FREEMASON POPE!]

* JOHN 23rd WELCOMES NON-CATHOLIC ROGER SCHUTZ, founder of the ecumenical community at Taize (a non-Catholic, ecumenical monastery) AT Second Vatican Council (VC2): “You are in the Church, be at peace.” Schutz exclaimed: “But then, we are Catholics!” John 23rd said: “Yes; we are no longer separated.” This is blatantly heretical.

* JOHN 23rd WELCOMES MUSLIM SHAH OF IRAN, by 1) removed the Most Holy Trinity who is invoked in the blessing, so that he wouldn’t offend the unbeliever; and 2) he gave a blessing to a member of a false religion. This is contrary to the scriptural teaching which forbids giving blessing to non-believers, as repeated by Pope Pius 11th.

* JOHN 23rd VOWS NOT TO CONDEMN COMMUNISM AT VC2, by brokering the “great deal” that was the Vatican-Moscow Agreement. The Vatican agreed not to condemn Communism at Vatican 2, in exchange for, get this, Eastern Schismatics to be able to observe the proceedings! That’s some deal, isn’t it! John 23rd was clearly a Freemason and probably a Communist; he was the man who began the massive conspiracy and apostasy that is the Vatican 2 sect.

* JOHN 23rd GIVES NON-CATHOLIC OBSERVERS FRONT ROW SEATS: “That won’t do! Put our separated brothers close to me.” As one pleased Anglican put it: “So, there we were – bang in the front row.”

* JOHN 23rd: STARTING in 1964, John 23rd ordered the removal of several Prayers at Mass, including the suppression of the Leonine Prayers, (prayers prescribed by Popes Leo 13th, Pope Saint Pius 10th, and Pope Pius 11th). This included the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel, a prayer that specifically makes mention of the battle that the Church wages against the Devil. John 23rd also removed the Psalm Judica from the Mass. John 23rd then suppressed the Last Gospel, at the end of Mass, which is also used in exorcisms.

* JOHN 23rd eliminated the second Confiteor in the Mass, then he introduced a change into the Canon of the Mass by inserting the name of St. Joseph. The request to have St. Joseph’s name placed in the canon was officially rejected by Pope Pius 7th on September 16, 1815, and by Pope Leo 13th on August 15, 1892. [John 23rd probably only wanted to set a precedence of minor change.]

* JOHN 23rd-- HERESY IN PACEM IN TERRIS ENCYCLICAL- Man's right to worship God according to his conscience, previously condemned by many Popes.

* JOHN 23rd-- PACEM IN TERRIS-- RECEIVES HIGHEST PRAISE BY FREEMASONS- 'UNIVERSALLY PRAISED' and its a 'vigorous statement of Masonic doctrine' and 'we...recommend its thoughtful reading'.

* JOHN 23rd would bless Jews leaving Sabbath Worship: “I am Joseph, your brother.” (quoting Genesis 45:4).

* JOHN 23rd WROTE A PRAYER FOR THE JEWS: .... Forgive us our unjustified condemnation of the Jews. Forgive us that by crucifying them we have crucified You for the second time. Forgive us. We did not know what we were doing.”

* JOHN 23rd says that the Jews are still the chosen people, which is heretical.

The Catholic Church teaches that a heretic cannot be a validly elected pope, since a heretic is not a member of the Catholic Church. John 23rd was not a valid pope. Angelo Roncalli (John 23rd) was a non-Catholic, conspiratorial antipope who started the Vatican 2 apostasy.



The name “John” had been avoided by popes for five hundred years because the last man to have it was the notorious Antipope John XXIII (Baldassare Cossa) of the Great Western Schism. The parallels between the first Antipope John XXIII (Baldassare Cossa) and the second (Angelo Roncalli) are striking:
1) The reign of the first Antipope John XXIII spanned five years, from 1410 to 1415, just like the reign of the recent Antipope John 23rd, which spanned five years, from 1958 to 1963.

2) The first Antipope John XXIII (1410-1415) called a phony council, the Council of Constance. (The Council of Constance later became a true ecumenical council, with certain sessions approved by the true pope; but at the time that Antipope John XXIII (1410-1415) opened it, it was a false council.) Likewise, the recent Antipope John 23rd (Angelo Roncalli) also called a false council, Vatican Council 2!

3) The first Antipope John XXIII (1410-1415) opened his false council at Constance in the 4th year of his reign, 1414. The recent Antipope John 23rd opened Vatican 2 in the 4th year of his reign, 1962.

4) The first Antipope John XXIII’s (1410-1415) reign ended shortly before the 3rd Session of his false Council, in 1415. The recent Antipope John 23rd died shortly before the 3rd Session of Vatican 2, in 1963, thus ending his reign.

Perhaps these similarities between the first Antipope John XXIII (1410-1415) and the second are not merely coincidences. The first Antipope John XXIII (1410-1415) was also the last antipope to reign from Rome.

Was Angelo Roncalli, the recent Antipope John 23rd, by taking that name, indicating symbolically (in the cryptic way that Freemasons do things) that he is continuing in the line of antipopes to reign from Rome?

Cardinal Heenan, who was present at the 1958 conclave which gave us John 23rd, once mentioned: “There was no great mystery about Pope John’s election. He was chosen because he was a very old man. His chief duty was to make Msgr. Montini (later Paul 6th), the Archbishop of Milan, a cardinal so that he could be elected in the next conclave. That was the policy and it was carried out precisely.”


Pope Paul 6th (1963-1978) [GIOVANNI MONTINI]

Paul 6th’s ancestors were of Jewish origin. His actual name was Giovanni Montini. The Montini family is listed in the Golden Book of Noble Italian Heritage (1962-1964, p. 994): “A branch of the… noble family from Brescia… where from their noble blazon comes and which avows as its sure trunk and founder, a Bartholomew (Bartolino) de Benedictis, said Montini was of Hebrew origin.

Paul 6th solemnly ratified all 16 documents of Vatican 2. It is not possible for a true pope of the Catholic Church to solemnly ratify teachings that are heretical, and it proves that Paul 6th was not a true pope, but an antipope. It’s important to keep in mind that Paul 6th was the one who gave the world the [outrageously simplified, and very doubtful Rite of Ordination], the [Modernist/Protestant] New Mass, and the other new “sacraments,” and the heretical teachings of Vatican 2.

* PAUL 6th RESPECTS AND ESTEEMS NON-CHRISTIAN RELIGIONS. The Catholic Church teaches that all non-Catholic religions are false. There is only one true Church, outside of which no one can be saved. This is Catholic dogma.

* PAUL 6th officially praised the false religion of Hinduism in the official Vatican II document Nostra Aetate #2 (on non-Christian religions). Pope Gregory 16th, Mirari Vos (# 13), Aug. 15, 1832: “They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that ‘those who are not with Christ are against Him,’ (Lk. 11:23) and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore, ‘without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate’ (Athanasian Creed).”

* PAUL 6th praised the fame and wisdom of pagan Shinto idols.

* PAUL 6th-- the false, pagan and idolatrous religion of Buddhism is one of the “riches” of Asia!

* PAUL 6th "the Church recognizes the riches of the Islamic faith – a faith that binds us to the one God.” Islam is a false religion which denies the Divinity of Christ and rejects the Most Holy Trinity. In short, their God is Not Our God! Besides rejecting the true God, Islam allows polygamy up to four wives, and its followers (Muslims) spread this false religion with a zeal unequaled by the others. Islam is the most viciously anti-Christian major false religion in the world. To convert to Christianity in many Islamic countries means death. The propagation of the true Faith is strictly prohibited by the Muslims. Islamic society is one of the most evil things in human history.

* PAUL 6th: “She [the Church] has also affirmed, during Her long history, at the cost of oppression and persecution, freedom for everyone to profess his own religion. No one, She says, is to be restrained from acting, no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs… As we said, the Council demanded a true and public religious freedom…” Paul 6th would have us believe, however, that the martyrs were tortured horribly, not for their profession of faith in Christ, but in order for all to have freedom to profess their various false religions! This is an astoundingly heretical distortion of the truth!

* PAUL 6th was photographed giving a clear Masonic handshake to the Eastern Schismatic Patriarch of Constantinople, Athenagoras, on Jan. 5, 1964.

THE TWO ALSO MUTUALLY LIFTED THE RECIPROCAL EXCOMMUNICATIONS OF 1054. Translation: this means that Paul 6th considered that the Eastern “Orthodox” are no longer excommunicated even though they deny the Papacy. Therefore, according to him, the Papacy is not a dogma binding under pain of excommunication. The Eastern Orthodox are schismatics who reject Papal Infallibility and the last 13 General Councils of the Catholic Church. They reject that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Second Person of the Trinity.

* PAUL 6th ON PROTESTANT SECTS: “From polemical opposition among the various Christian denominations we have passed to mutual respect…” Protestantism began with the German priest Martin Luther, who left the Catholic Church and started the Protestant revolution in 1517. Luther denied free will, the Papacy, praying to the saints, Purgatory, Tradition, Transubstantiation and the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Luther replaced the Mass with a memorial service commemorating the Last Supper. All the sacraments except Baptism and the Holy Eucharist were rejected. Luther held that after the fall of Adam man cannot produce any good works. Most Protestants hold the same beliefs as Luther, but all of them reject numerous Catholic dogmas. Paul 6th has an attitude of acceptance of, and mutual respect for, their false religion.

* PAUL 6th: “The World Council of Churches has been created in order, by the grace of God, to serve the Churches and Ecclesial Communities in their endeavors to restore and to MANIFEST TO ALL THAT PERFECT COMMUNION IN FAITH AND LOVE WHICH IS THE GIFT OF CHRIST TO HIS CHURCH.” ...AND NOT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH apparently! The World Council of Churches is an organization made up of many different sects and denominations. But it is undoubtedly a very heretical ecumenical organization made of various man-made religions.

* Paul 6th wants to unite with the Anglican Church, without converting it.




This is the Catholic Mass that we all know, that was initiated in 1969, by Paul 6th


The Novus Ordo Mass eliminated 10 of the 12 Offertory Prayers, which were the very same 10 deleted by Martin Luther in 1517. In 1960, during the Papal reign of John 23rd, Father Bugnini was placed in a position which enabled him to exert a decisive influence on the future of the Catholic Liturgy: he was appointed Secretary to the Preparatory Commission for the Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council. He was the moving spirit behind the drafting of the preparatory schema, the draft document which was to be placed before the Council Fathers for discussion. It was referred to as the "Bugnini schema" by his admirers, and was accepted by a plenary session of the Liturgical Preparatory Commission in a vote taken on 13 January 1962.

Pope Paul 6th even admitted to his good friend Jean Guitton that his intention in changing the Mass was to make it Protestant. Pope Paul 6th removed what was too Catholic in the Mass, in order to make the Mass a Protestant service:
Jean Guitton (an intimate friend of Paul 6th) wrote:

“The intention of Pope Paul 6th with regard to what is commonly called the [New] Mass, was to reform the Catholic liturgy in such a way that it should almost coincide with the Protestant liturgy. There was with Pope Paul 6th an ecumenical intention to remove, or, at least to correct, or, at least to relax, what was too Catholic in the traditional sense in the Mass and, I repeat, to get the Catholic Mass closer to the Calvinist Mass.”

The Liturgy Constitution for which the Council Fathers eventually voted was substantially identical to the draft schema which Father Bugnini had steered successfully through the Preparatory Commission in the face of considerable misgivings on the part of Cardinal Gaetano Cicognani, President of the Commission. In addition to Father Bugnini, six Protestants were Key in the decisions surrounding the New Mass. They were Protestant Theoligical Doctors: George, Jasper, Shepherd, Kunneth, Smith, and Thurian. In addition, new evidence has come to light throwing suspicions on Father Annibale Bugnini as a Freemason.

The Novus Ordo reforms violated the Papal Bull of Pope Pius 5th in the 'De Defectibus' (July 14, 1570), in which no words in the Tridentine Latin Mass could be changed, without their meaning exactly the same thing:

“Now, therefore, in order that all everywhere may adopt and observe what has been delivered to them by the Holy Roman Church, Mother and Mistress of the other churches, it shall be unlawful henceforth and forever throughout the Christian world to sing or to read Masses according to any formula other than this Missal published by Us… Accordingly, no one whosoever is permitted to infringe or rashly contravene this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, direction, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition. Should any venture to do so, let him understand that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”


All they had to do was institute all of the changes that the Protestant Reformers, Thomas Cranmer and Martin Luther instituted.

The Novus Ordo Reformers had a plan:

The altars were replaced by tables. Latin was replaced by English. Statues and icons were removed from the churches. The Last Gospel and the Confiteor were abolished. “Communion” was distributed in the hand. Mass was said out loud and facing the Congregation. Traditional music was discarded and replaced with new music.

Their plan was exactly the same as Cranmer and Luther in 1549:

The altars were replaced by tables. Latin was replaced by English. Statues and icons were removed from the churches. The Last Gospel and the Confiteor were abolished. “Communion” was distributed in the hand. Mass was said out loud and facing the Congregation. Traditional music was discarded and replaced with new music.

The Roman Canon was abolished by the 1549 Anglican Prayer Book. It has been retained only as an option in the New Mass.

In order to emphasize their heretical belief that the Mass is not a sacrifice, but just a meal, the Protestants removed the altar and put a table in its place. In Protestant England, for example,

“On November 23, 1550 the Privy Council ordered all altars in England destroyed and replaced by communion tables.”

The chief Protestant heretics declared:

"The form of a table shall more move the simple from the superstitious opinions of the popish Mass unto the right use of the Lord’s Supper. For the use of an altar is to make sacrifice upon it: the use of a table is to serve men to eat upon.”

The Welsh Catholic martyr, Richard Gwyn, declared in protest against this change:

"In place of an altar, there is a miserable table, in place of Christ there is bread.”

The 1549 Anglican Prayer Book was also called “The Supper of the Lord, and the holy Communion, commonly called the Mass.” This title emphasized the Protestant belief that the Mass is just a meal, a supper – and not a sacrifice.

When Paul VI promulgated the General Instruction for the New Mass, it was entitled exactly the same way. Its title was: “The Lord’s Supper or Mass."

The 1549 Anglican Prayer Book removed from the Mass the psalm Give Judgment for me, O God, because of its reference to the altar of God. This psalm was also suppressed in the New Mass.

The 1549 Anglican Prayer Book removed from the Mass the prayer which begins Take away from us our sins, because it evokes sacrifice. This was also suppressed in the New Mass.

The prayer which begins We beseech Thee, O Lord, refers to relics in the altar stone. This prayer has been suppressed in the New Mass.

In the 1549 Anglican Prayer Book the Introit, Kyrie, Gloria, Collect, Epistle, Gospel and Creed were all retained. They have all been retained in the New Mass.

The equivalent to the Offertory Prayers: Accept, O holy Father…O God, Who has established the nature of man…We offer unto Thee, O Lord…In a humble spirit…Come, Thou Sanctifier, almighty… and Accept, most holy Trinity, were all suppressed in the 1549 Anglican Prayer Book. They have all been suppressed in the New Mass, except for two excerpts.

In the 1549 Anglican Prayer Book, the Lift up your hearts dialogue, Preface and Sanctus were all retained. They have been retained in the New Mass.

What has passed our lips as food and May Thy Body, O Lord, which I have eaten both make explicit reference to the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Both have been suppressed in the New Mass.

The prayer which begins May the tribute of my worship be pleasing to thee, most holy Trinity, was the least acceptable prayer after Communion to all the Protestants, because of its reference to propitiatory sacrifice. Martin Luther, and Cranmer in his Anglican Prayer Book, suppressed it. Following their lead, it was suppressed in the New Mass.

Now to the Last Gospel. If the Last Gospel, which closes the Traditional Mass, had been included in the New Mass, then the New Mass would have clashed with the pattern of Protestant services, which conclude with a blessing. So it was not included in the New Mass.

The prayers after the Traditional Mass, the Leonine Prayers, including the Hail Mary; the Hail Holy Queen; the O God our refuge; the prayer to St. Michael; and the appeal to the Sacred Heart, formed, in practice, an important part of the liturgy. Five prayers less compatible with Protestantism could hardly be imagined. They have all been suppressed in the New Mass.

Besides the fact that the New Mass is a Protestant service, there is also the fact that the Novus Ordo churches bear a striking and undeniable resemblance to Freemasonic lodges. “Cardinal” Annibale Bugnini, was Chairman of the Consilium which drafted Paul 6th’s New Mass. Bugnini was initiated into the Masonic Lodge on April 23, 1963, according to the Masonic Register in 1976.

If you accept Vatican 2 or the New Mass or the new sacramental rites – in short, if you accept the Vatican 2 religion – this is the man whose religion you are following, a manifestly heretical infiltrator, whose whole mission was to attempt to overturn and destroy as much of the Catholic Faith as possible.

Catholics must have no part with Antipope Paul 6th’s New Mass (the Novus Ordo) and must completely reject Vatican 2 and the new sacramental rites.

Catholics must completely reject Antipope Paul 6th for the non-Catholic antipope he was. Catholics must reject and not support any group which accepts this apostate as a valid pope, or which accepts the New Mass or Vatican 2 or the new sacramental rites of Paul 6th.




About a year before the Tridentine Mass was eliminated, in favor of Norvus Ordo Mass, the Ordination Rites for New Priests and Bishops eliminated all of the essentials.

How old is the Priest at your Parish? Younger than 70, or so?

Our Catholic Priests were hi-jacked by Pope Paul 6th and made invalid, and Null and Void, on the advice and counsel of Protestants, on June 18, 1968, in Pope Paul 6th's Pontificalis Romani, so that every person who was 'ordained' since then, has been called into question!

Pope Paul 6th's Pontificalis Romani is reproduced here, in its entireity:
Pontificalis Romani recognitio - Approval of New Rites of Ordination

Promulgated June 18, 1968
Apostolic Constitution
Paul, Bishop
Servant of the Servants of God for an Everlasting Memorial
The revision of the Roman Pontifical is prescribed in a general way by the
Second Vatican Ecumenical Council and is also governed by the specific
conciliar directive ordering the revision of "both the ceremonies and texts" of
the ordination rites.

Among the rites of ordination the first to be considered are those that
constitute the hierarchy through the sacrament of orders, conferred in its
several degrees. "The divinely established eclesiastical ministry is exercised
at different levels by those who from antiquity have been called bishops,
presbyters, and deacons."

The revision of the rites for ordinations is to follow the general principles
that must direct the entire reform of the Liturgy according to the decrees of
Vatican Council II. But in addition a supreme criterion for that revision must
be the dear teaching of the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church concerning the nature and effects of the sacrament of orders. This teaching must of course
receive expression through the Liturgy itself in its own way, because "the texts
and rites should be so drawn up that they express more clearly the holy things
they signify and that the Christian people, as hr as possible, are able to
understand them with ease and to take part in the rites fully, actively, and as
befits a community."

The Council teaches that episcopal consecration bestows the fullness of the
sacrament of orders, that fullness of power, namely, which in both the Church's
liturgical practice and the language of the Fathers is called the high
priesthood, the summit of the sacred ministry. But episcopal consecration,
together with the of office of sanctifying also confers the offices of teaching
and governing offices that of their very nature can be exercised only in
hierarchic communion with the head of the college and its members. For from
tradition, expressed especially in Liturgical rites and in the usage of the
Church of both East and West, it is dear that the laying on of hands and the
words of consecration bestow the grace of the Holy Spirit and impress a sacred
character in such a way that bishops in an eminent and visible way carry on the
role of Christ himself as teacher, shepherd, and high priest and act in his

To these words must be added a number of important doctrinal points concerning  the apostolic succession of bishops and their functions and duties. Even if these themes are already present in the rite of episcopal consecration, it still seems that they must be better and more precisely expressed. To ensure this, it was judged appropriate to take from ancient sources the consecratory prayer that is found in the document called the Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus of Rome, written at the beginning of the third century. This consecratory prayer is still used, in large part, in the ordination rites of the Coptic and West Syrian liturgies. Thus in the very act of ordination there is a witness to the harmony of tradition in East and West concerning the apostolic office of bishops.

With regard to presbyters, the following should be especially recalled from the
acts of the Council: "Even though they do not possess the fullness of the
priesthood and in the exercise of their power are subordinate to the bishops,
priests are nevertheless linked to the bishops in priestly dignity. By virtue of
the sacrament of orders, in the image of Christ the eternal High Priest (see
Heb 5:1-10 and 7-24, 9:11-28), they are consecrated to preach the Gospel, to
shepherd the faithful, and to celebrate divine worship as true priests of the
New Testament."

Elsewhere the Council says: "By ordination and the mission
they receive from the bishops, presbyters are promoted to the service of Christ
the Teacher, Priest, and King. They share in his ministry of unceasingly
building up the Church on earth into the people of God, the Body of Christ, and
the temple of the Holy Spirit." In the ordination of presbyters, as formerly
given in the Roman Pontifical, the mission and grace of the presbyter as a
helper of the episcopal order were very clearly described. Yet it seemed
necessary to reduce the entire rite, which had been divided into several parts,
to a greater unity and to express more strikingly the central part of the
ordination, that is, the laying on of hands and the consecratory prayer.

Finally, with regard to deacons, in addition to the content of our Motu Proprio
Sacrum Diaconatus Ordinem, issued 18 June 1967, the following should be
especially recalled:

"At a lower level of the hierarchy are deacons, who receive  the laying on of hands 'not unto priesthood, but only for a ministry service'  (Constitutions of the Church of Egypt 3, 2). Strengthened by sacramental grace, they have as their service for the people of God, in communion with the bishop  and his college of presbyters, the diakonia of liturgy, word, and charity."  In the ordination of deacons a few changes had to be made to satisfy the recent
prescriptions about the diaconate as a distinct and permanent grade of the
hierarchy in the Latin Church or to achieve a greater simplicity and clarity in
the rites.

Among the other documents of the magisterium pertaining to sacred orders, we
consider one worthy of particular mention, namely, the Apostolic Constitution
Sacramentum Ordinis published by our predecessor, Pius Xll, 30 November 1947. In  this Constitution he declared that "the sole matter of the sacred orders of  diaconate and presbyterate is the laying on of hands; likewise the sole form is  the words determine, the application of this matter, which unequivocally signify  the sacramental effects--namely, the power of orders and the grace of the Holy  Spirit and are accepted and used as such by the Church." After this, the  document determines which laying on of hands and which words constitute the  matter and form in the conferring of each order. It was necessary in the
revision of the rite to add, delete, or change certain things, in order to  restore the texts of the rite to the form they had in antiquity, to clarify  expressions, or to bring out more clearly the effects of the sacraments. We therefore think it necessary, so as to remove all controversy and avoid  perplexity of conscience, to declare what are to be held as the essentials in each revised rite. By our supreme apostolic authority we decree and establish  the following with regard to the matter and form in the conferring of each order:

In the ordination of deacons, the matter is the laying of the bishop's hands on
the individual candidates that is done in silence before the consecratory
prayer; the form consists in the words of the consecratory prayer, of which the
following belong to the essence and are consequently required for validity:

send forth upon them the Holy Spirit,
that they be strengthened
by the gift of your sevenfold grace
to carry out faithfully the work of the ministry.

In the ordination of presbyters, the matter is likewise the laying of the bishop's hands on the individual candidates that is done in silence before the
consecratory prayer; the form consists in the words of the consecratory prayer,
of which the following belongs to the essence and are consequently required for

Almighty Father,
grant to these servants of yours
the dignity of the priesthood.
Renew within them the Spirit of holiness.
As co-workers with the order of bishops
may they be faithful to the ministry
that they receive from you, Lord God,
and be to others a model of right conduct.

Finally, in the ordination of a bishop, the matter is the laying of hands on the
head of the bishop-elect by the consecrating bishops, or at least by the
principal consecrator, that is done in silence before the consecratory prayer;
the form consists in the words of the consecratory prayer, of which the
following belong to the essence and are consequently required for validity:

So now pour out upon this chosen one
that power which is from you,
the governing Spirit
whom you gave to your beloved Son, Jesus Christ,
the Spirit given by him to the holy apostles,
who founded the Church in every place to be your temple
for the unceasing glory and praise of your name.

This rite for the conferring of the orders of diaconate, presbyterate, and
episcopate has been revised by the Consilium for the Implementation of the
Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy "with the employment of experts and with the consultation of bishops, from various parts of the world." By our apostolic
authority we approve this rite so that it may be used in the future for the
conferral of these orders in place of the rite now found in the Roman Pontifical.

It is our will that these our decrees and prescriptions be firm and effective
now and in the future, notwithstanding, to the extent necessary, the apostolic
constitutions and ordinances issued by our predecessors and other prescriptions, even those deserving particular mention and amendment.

Given at Rome, at Saint Peter's, 18 June 1968, the fifth year of our

Paul VI

Pope Leo 13th issued a Bull on September 13, 1896, (Apostolicae Curae), rendering the Ordination of priests in the Angilican Rite as Null and Void. In his Bull, Pope Leo 13th made it clear why, and his ruling applied to the Angilicans and to any such Ordinations in the future, because of defects in the Rite of Ordination.

Those same defects, are present in the New Ordination Rite established by Pope Paul 6th. Essentially, there is no clear mention of sacrifice, or of consecration, or of confession. Pope Paul 6th even consulted with Protestants for advice, in formulating the New Ordination! Since Protestants have no sacrifice, no consecration, and no confession, they lobbied for their elimination, so Pope Paul 6th eliminated them:

"For it is a priest's duty to offer sacrifice, to bless, to lead, to preach, and to baptize." This prayer was eliminated.

"Theirs be the task to change with blessing undefiled, for the service of thy people, bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Thy Son" -This prayer was eliminated.

"Be pleased, Lord, to consecrate and sanctify these hands, by this anointing, and our blessing. That whatsoever thy bless, may be blessed, and whatever thy consecrate, may be consecrated, and sanctified, in the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ." -This prayer was eliminated.

"Receive the power to sacrifice to God, and to celebrate Mass, both for the living, and for the dead, in the name of the Lord" -This prayer was eliminated.
"Receive the Holy Ghost. Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained." -This prayer was eliminated.

"The Blessing of God Almighty, the Father, the Son, the Holy Ghost, come down upon you, and make you blessed in the priestly order, enabling you to offer propitiatory [having power to atone for] sacrifices for the sins of the people to Almighty God." -This prayer was eliminated.
The only essential prayer specified by Pope Paul 6th, is for 'presbyters', the pope's new name for Priests: presbyters are defined as "an elder or minister of the Christian Church"- specifically: "in Presbyterian Churches- and elder, or in Epispocal Churches- a minister of the second order under a bishop; a priest."
The only essential prayer specified by Pope Paul 6th, is as follows:

"Almighty Father, grant to these servants of yours the dignity of the priesthood. Renew within them the Spirit of holiness. As co-workers with the order of bishops may they be faithful to the ministry that they receive from you, Lord God, and be to others a model of right conduct."

The only phrase that an optimist can hang his hat on, in the above section is this: "...may they be faithful to the ministry that they receive from you, Lord God, ..."

Lest there be any doubt as to whether the Protestants were in charge that day, Pope Paul 6th also reordered the hierarchy of the Church to conform to the Protestants 'Deacon', 'priest', and 'Bishop' structure, by establishing a New Ordination Rite for Deacons, 'presbyters', and Bishops.

The proper Traditional Roman Catholic Form, established by Pope Pius 12th for Bishops follows:

“Perfect in Thy priest the fullness of thy ministry and, clothing him in all the ornaments of spiritual glorification, sanctify him with the Heavenly anointing.”
The Modernist Novus Ordo form, established by Pope Paul 6th for Bishops follows:

“So now pour out upon this chosen one that power which is from you, the governing Spirit whom you gave to your beloved Son, Jesus Christ, the Spirit given by him to the holy apostles, who founded the Church in every place to be your temple for the unceasing glory and praise of your name.”

The bottom line?

If your Parish Priest is younger than about 70, or so, he was most likely Ordained after June 18, 1968. If that's so, he is perhaps not a properly ordained priest, which calls into question, all of the Masses that he has said, and all of the sacraments he has officiated at. Think back to Baptisms, Confirmations, Holy Communion, Confession (Reconciliation), Marriage, and Extreme Unction. In short, our Catholic Faith, and our ticket to Heaven, has been hi-jacked by Antipope Paul 6th, and his Protestant advisers.


* PAUL 6th ON BIRTH CONTROL: “It cannot be denied that in each case the married couple, for acceptable reasons, are both perfectly clear in their intention to avoid children and wish to make sure that none will result.” again: “…the liberty of husband and wife and does not forbid them a moral and reasonable limitation of birth…” again: “…this, among other effects, will undoubtedly favor a rational control of birth by couples…” Paul 6th says in Humanae Vitae that couples are perfectly free to have zero children if they want to.

* PAUL 6th GAVE AWAY HIS SYMBOL OF AUTHORITY: The Papal Tiara is a sign of a true Pope’s authority – the three crowns representing the dogmatic, liturgical and disciplinary authority of a pope.

* PAUL 6th WORE THE BREASTPLATE OF THE EPHOD, a vestment used by Freemasons and Jewish High-Priests. This breastplate is small, and resembles a small drink trivet made of 12 small stones. The twelve stones represent the twelve tribes of Israel. Not only is this the breast-plate of a Jewish High-Priest, but according to the Encyclopedia of Freemasonry by Mackey, the ephod is also “worn in the (Masonic) American Chapters of the Royal Arch, by the High-Priest as an official part of his official ornaments.” The ephod was the vestment that was worn by Caiphas, the High-Priest of the Jewish religion, who ordered Our Lord Jesus Christ to be put to death by crucifixion.

Paul 6th gave back to the Muslims the Standard of Lepanto. The history of the flag was venerable. It was taken from a Turkish admiral during a great naval battle in 1571. While Pope St. Pius 5th fasted and prayed the Rosary, an out-numbered Christian fleet defeated a much larger Moslim navy, thus saving Christendom from the infidel. In honor of the miraculous victory, Pius 5th instituted the Feast of Our Lady of the Most Holy Rosary to commemorate her intercession. In one dramatic act, Paul 6th renounced not only a remarkable Christian victory, but the prayers and sacrifices of a great pope and saint.

* PAUL 6th-- REVIEW:
In addition to all of the heresies we have covered in the speeches of Paul 6th, he was the man who authoritatively implemented the false Second Vatican Council, changed the Catholic Mass into a Protestant service, and changed the rite of every single Sacrament. He changed the matter or form of the Eucharist, Extreme Unction, Holy Orders, and Confirmation. Within two years of the close of Vatican 2, Paul 6th removed the index of forbidden books, a decision one commentator rightly called “incomprehensible.”

Paul 6th then abolished the oath against Modernism, at a time when Modernism was flourishing as never before. On Nov. 21, 1970, Paul 6th also excluded all cardinals over 80 years of age from participating in papal elections.

Paul 6th disestablished the papal court, disbanded the Noble Guard and the Palatine Guards. According to those who watched film of Paul 6th’s visit to Fatima, he did not pray one Hail Mary.

In 1969, Paul 6th removed forty saints from the official liturgical calendar. Paul 6th removed solemn exorcisms from the baptismal rite. In the place of the solemn exorcisms, he substituted an optional prayer that makes only a passing reference to fighting the Devil.

Paul 6th granted more than 32,000 requests from priests who had asked to be released from their vows and returned to lay status – the greatest exodus from the priesthood since the Protestant revolution.

Paul 6th’s disastrous influence was visible immediately. For example, in Holland not a single candidate applied for admission to the priesthood in 1970, and within 12 months every seminary there was closed. Spiritual destruction was everywhere; countless millions left the Church; countless others ceased practicing their Faith and confessing their sins.

And while Paul 6th was the cause of this unrelenting disaster and spiritual destruction, like the sly serpent he was, he calculatingly misdirected the attention away from himself. In perhaps his most famous quotation, he noted that Satan’s smoke had made its way into the Temple of God.

Paul 6th, Homily, June 29, 1972: “Satan’s smoke has made its way into the Temple of God through some crack…”

Apoc. 9:1-3: “And there was given to him the key of the bottomless pit. And he opened the bottomless pit: and the smoke of the pit arose, as the smoke of a great furnace…”

In Apocalypse 9, we see a direct reference to the smoke of Satan, and to someone who is given the key to unleash it. Antipope Paul 6th did not have the keys of Peter, but he was given the key to the bottomless pit. He was the one who brought in the smoke of Satan from the great furnace; as he says, from some crack.

Jean Guitton, an intimate friend of Paul 6th, related what Paul 6th said at the final session of Vatican 2:

“It was the final session of the Council,” Guitton wrote, “the most essential, in which Paul 6th was to bestow on all humanity the teachings of the Council. He announced this to me on that day with these words, ‘I am about to blow the seven trumpets of the Apocalypse.’ ”

Paul 6th, Speech to Lombard Seminary, Dec. 7, 1968: “The Church finds herself in an hour of disquiet, of self-criticism, one might say even of self-destruction… The Church is wounding herself.”

Here Paul 6th again mocks the people. He says the Church is in “self-destruction” and is “wounding herself.” He is referring to himself again, for he was the one trying to destroy her, and wound her at every turn!


Pope John Paul 1st (1978-1978) [Albino Luciani]
Pope John Paul 1st was Pope for only 33 days.

Father Mario Senigaglia, secretary to John Paul I when he was “Patriarch” of Venice, said of Albino Luciani: “He could and did accept divorcees. He also easily accepted others who were living in what the Church calls ‘sin.’ ”

Luciani (John Paul I) had several times quoted Hans Kung favorably in his sermons. (For those who don’t know, Hans Kung denies the Divinity of Christ.) Luciani “was aware that a number of the lay Catholics he knew were members of various lodges (Masonic) – in much the same way that he had friends who were Communists.”

The Vatican claimed that John Paul I died of a massive heart attack around 11 p.m. on September 28, 1978.

John Paul I was a manifest heretic who, among other things, fully approved of the religious indifferentism and false ecumenism of the Second Vatican Council. Since he was a heretic, he could not have been a validly elected pope. He was a non-Catholic antipope.


Pope John Paul 2nd (1978-2005) [Karol Jozef Wojtyla]

Two men instigated the Vatican 2 apostasy and revolution – John 23rd and Paul 6th – and they were not legitimate Popes, but actually non-Catholic Antipopes.

Now we will shine the spotlight on the man who has perpetuated the Vatican 2 apostasy to levels that far exceed that of John 23rd and Paul 6th. We will shine the spotlight on John Paul 2, arguably the greatest heretic in the history of the world, and we will prove that he is not and cannot be the real Pope of the Catholic Church.

To understand why John Paul 2 cannot be the Pope, one must understand heresy and apostasy. Heresy is the obstinate denial or doubt by a baptized person of an article of divine and Catholic Faith. In other words, a baptized person who deliberately denies an authoritative teaching of the Catholic Church is a heretic. Pope Leo 13th proclaims this teaching in his encyclical Satis Cognitum.

Pope Leo 13th, Satis Cognitum (# 9), June 29, 1896: “The practice of the Church has always been the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, who were wont to hold as outside Catholic communion, and alien to the Church, whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of doctrine proposed by her authoritative Magisterium.”

Apostasy, on the other hand, is not merely the denial or doubt of one or more teachings of the Catholic Church, but a complete rejection of the Christian Faith altogether.

Moreover, in judging that John Paul 2 is a heretic and is not the Pope (and is therefore an Antipope), one is not judging the Holy See; rather, as the teaching already quoted shows, one is correctly identifying that a manifest heretic is outside the Church and therefore cannot occupy the Holy See.

St. Robert Bellarmine: “A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction.” (De Romano Pontifice, II, 30)

And the truth expressed by these saints, such as St. Robert Bellarmine, that a heretic cannot be the Pope, is not merely their fallible opinion, as some defenders of John Paul 2 have argued; rather, the teaching expressed by these saints is a dogmatic fact. It is rooted in the infallible dogma that heretics cannot be members of the Catholic Church.


The only difficulty in treating of the heresies of John Paul 2 is deciding where to begin. His heresies are so numerous that one is almost overwhelmed with the decision of where to start. We decided that a good place to begin is his consistent teaching of universal salvation. It goes without saying that the idea that all men are saved is contrary to the clear words of the Gospel and numerous Catholic dogmas, especially the dogmas that Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and that all who die in original sin or mortal sin cannot be saved.

Pope Gregory 10th, 2nd Council of Lyons, 1274, ex cathedra: “The souls of those who die in mortal sin or with original sin only… immediately descend into hell, yet to be punished with different punishments.”

However, it is a fact that Antipope John Paul 2 holds and teaches that in the Incarnation, the Son of God united himself with every man in an unbreakable union, which makes it impossible, according to him, for anyone to go to Hell. Antipope John Paul 2 explicitly teaches that this union between Christ and each man lasts forever.

Antipope John Paul 2, Homily, June 6, 1985: “The Eucharist is the sacrament of the covenant of the Body and Blood of Christ, of the covenant which is eternal. This is the covenant which embraces all. This Blood reaches all and saves all.”

In contrast with this, the dogmatic teaching of the Catholic Church affirms that the blood of Christ does not reach all or save all:

Pope Paul 3rd, Council of Trent, Sess. 6, ex cathedra: “But although Christ died for all, yet not all receive the benefit of His death, but those only to whom the merit of His Passion is communicated.”

Only those who are freed from original sin by baptism, and united to Him through the sacraments and the true faith, receive the benefit of Christ’s death.

* JOHN PAUL 2-- The Holy Ghost is responsible for Non-Christian Religions. The Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, is actually the spirit of lies – Satan. This is an unbelievable blasphemy against God.

* JOHN PAUL 2's ASSISI world day of prayer for peace on Oct. 27, 1986.
John Paul 2 prayed with over 130 different religious leaders of all kinds of religions, thereby repudiating the teaching of Scripture and the 2000-year teaching of the Catholic Church outlawing prayer with false religions. The 1986 Assisi event is exactly – I repeat – exactly what Pope Pius 11th authoritatively condemned in his encyclical Mortalium Animos.

Pope Pius 11th, Mortalium Animos (# 2), Jan. 6, 1928: “For which reason conventions, meetings and addresses are frequently arranged by these persons, at which a large number of listeners are present, and at which all without distinction are invited to join in the discussion, both infidels of every kind, and Christians… Certainly such attempts can nowise be approved by Catholics, founded as they are on that false opinion which considers all religions to be more or less good and praiseworthy…”

* John Paul 2 sponsored pagan prayer meetings at Kyoto (1987), Rome (1988), Warsaw (1989), Bari (1990), and Malta (1991), as well as numerous meetings since that time.

Most recently there was the spectacle of Assisi 2002. On Jan. 24, 2002, Antipope John Paul 2 held another pagan prayer meeting in the city of Assisi Italy, a repeat of the abominable event that took place in 1986. But this Assisi meeting may have been even worse. During the prayer meeting the representative of every false religion involved was allowed to come to the pulpit and give a sermon on world peace. In the presence of Antipope John Paul 2, a voodoo high priest came to the pulpit outside the Basilica of St. Francis and gave the voodoo prescription for world peace. (Voodoo, remember, is Satanism). So, by Antipope John Paul 2’s arrangement, from a pulpit outside the historic Basilica of St. Francis, a Satanist was allowed to give a sermon and provide his prescription for world peace. This would involve slitting the throats of goats, chickens, doves and pigeons, and draining their blood from their arteries.

After the Jew, the Buddhist, the Muslim, the Hindu and the rest were finished preaching, the various false religious leaders broke up into different rooms to pray to their false gods. Antipope John Paul II had it arranged in advance that each religious group was given a separate room in which to worship the devil. All of the crucifixes were removed, and the crucifixes which could not be removed were covered. Antipope John Paul 2 made sure that the infidels and pagans saw no sign of Jesus Christ.

The Muslims needed a room which faced East toward Mecca – and it was given to them. The Zoroastrians needed a room with a window, so that the smoke from the wood chips that they burned to the devil could exit through it – and it was given to them. The Jews wanted a room that had never before been blessed; in other words, a room that had never been blessed in the name of Jesus Christ – and Antipope John Paul 2 provided them with one. Greater abomination, blasphemy and rejection of the true God almost cannot be imagined.

* JOHN PAUL 2: The Old Covenant Has Never Been Revoked, the Jewish Religion is Valid and True. Therefore, to say that the Old Covenant is still valid is to assert that Judaism is a true religion and that Jesus Christ is not really the Messiah. It is also to deny defined Catholic dogma, such as the teaching of The Council of Florence, which defined ex cathedra that the Old Law is now dead and that those who practice it (namely, the Jews) cannot be saved.

* JOHN PAUL 2's JEWISH SERVICE AT THE VATICAN, Crucifixes Covered: The Jewish Maestro Gilbert Levine, after the service, said: “It was like I was in a Jewish liturgical service in the Vatican. It was a night of prayer… of Jewish prayer.”

* JOHN PAUL 2 PRAYED AT THE WESTERN WALL IN JERUSALEM, in an attempt to validate Judaism. On March 26, 2000, Antipope John Paul 2 prayed at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. The Western Wall is the stone remnant of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem that was destroyed by the Romans in 70 A.D. The Jews pray at the Western Wall as the holiest site in Judaism. The destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D., leaving only the Western Wall, has always been understood by Catholics to signify God’s judgment on the Jews. The destruction of the Temple prohibited Jews from being able to offer sacrifice, which meant that their religion had come to an end. The destruction of the Temple was God’s powerful sign to the Jews that the Messiah had come, that the Old Covenant had ceased, and that the Temple had been replaced by the Catholic Church. So when a Jew prays at the Western Wall, or leaves a prayer there, it is a denial that Jesus is the Messiah; it is an affirmation that he holds that the Old Covenant is still in force; and it is a pitiful and sad attempt to ignore God’s very obvious sign that the Jews must abandon the destroyed Temple and enter the Catholic Church. The prayer that Antipope John Paul 2 left at the Western Wall asked forgiveness for sins against the Jewish people. In late 2001, a Vatican Commission under Antipope John Paul 2 released a book entitled The Jewish People and the Holy Scriptures in the Christian Bible. The book argues that the Jews’ wait for the coming of the Messiah is still valid.

* JOHN PAUL 2-- MUSLIMS AND CATHOLICS WORSHIP THE SAME GOD: This is blasphemy and apostasy. Muslims reject the Most Holy Trinity. They do not worship the One True God. By asserting that Muslims and Catholics believe in the same God over and over again, Antipope John Paul 2 is denying the Most Holy Trinity over and over again. For example, in the NEW CATECHISM:

Antipope John Paul 2, New Catechism (paragraph 841): “… Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.” Here we find Antipope John Paul 2’s Catechism teaching that the Muslims’ god (who is not Jesus Christ) will judge mankind on the last day! It is a denial of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to judge the living and the dead.

* JOHN PAUL 2-- SCHISMATICS SHOULD NOT BE CONVERTED. To proselytize is to try to convert someone. [Spreading the Faith is central to the Roman Catholic Church]



[As a side note, from the website, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops website, in 2009 stated:
An official of the US bishops’ Secretariat for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs wrote:

"Proselytism, or the deliberate targeting of another Christian or group of Christians for the sole purpose of getting them to reject their church to join another, is not allowed. Some people may feel called in conscience to change from one tradition to another, but “sheep stealing” is unacceptable."
Although the USCCB press release summarizes several aspects of the Magisterium’s teaching on ecumenism, it fails to emphasize the obligation of Catholics to proclaim the Catholic faith to non-Catholic Christians.]



[It is also restated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition:

"1401 When, in the Ordinary's judgement, a grave necessity arrises, Catholic ministers may give the Sacraments of Eucharist, Penance, and Annointing of the Sick, to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who ask for them of their own free will, provided they give evidence of holding the Catholic Faith, regarding these Sacraments and possess the required dispositions."]



* JOHN PAUL 2-- NON-CATHOLIC SECTS HAVE SAINTS AND MARTYRS AND THEY CAN BE SAVED IF THEY SHED THEIR BLOOD FOR CHRIST. This proves that Antipope John Paul 2 directly rejects the solemnly defined dogma, (from the Council of Florence), that non-Catholics cannot be saved, even if they shed their blood for Christ.

* JOHN PAUL 2-- Approved Altar Girls, previously condemned as evil by Benedict 14th, Pope Saint Gelasius, and Pope Innocent 4th.

[This prohibition of Altar Girls, would likely extent to Female eucharistic Ministers, as well, since ancient language specifically forbids "women serving the priest at the celebration of Mass."]

[On 29 March, 1973, the Associated Press reported: ‘Pope Paul 6th ruled today that women, regardless of whether they are nuns, may distribute Communion in Roman Catholic churches.’]

* JOHN PAUL 2 PRAISED PROTESTANT Relolutionaries CALVIN and LUTHER. To patronize, support and defend heretics is to be a heretic.

* JOHN PAUL 2 praised notorious heretics Zwingli and Hus, and praised Hus as a man of “infallible personal integrity”!

* JOHN PAUL 2 CONDEMNED THE CRUSADES. The Crusades were solemnly approved by four Councils and more than 10 Popes, including: Pope Urban 2; Pope Callistus 2; Pope Alexander 3rd; Pope Callistus 3rd; Pope Clement 5th; and others.

* JOHN PAUL 2 EARNED THE HIGHEST HONOR OF FREEMASONERY. The representative of Italian Freemasonry, in 1996, noted that Antipope John Paul 2 merited the honor because he had promoted “the values of universal Freemasonry: fraternity, respect for the dignity of man, and the spirit of tolerance, central points of the life of true masons.”




* JOHN PAUL 2 Dec. 25, 1978: “Christmas is the feast of man.”


If Antipope John Paul 2 is part of a different religion, and who would dare deny this, then he cannot be the head of the Catholic Church. St. Francis De Sales, Doctor of the Church: “It would indeed be one of the strangest monsters that could be seen – if the head of the Church were not of the Church. This is why Pope Paul 4th solemnly taught in his Feb. 15, 1559 Bull, cum ex Apostolatus officio, that it is impossible for a heretic to be validly elected Pope.

Furthermore, there are those who have rightfully acknowledged that the Vatican 2 Church is clearly not the Catholic Church, but they still maintain that Antipope John Paul 2 is the Pope. They hold that Antipope John Paul 2 can be a true Pope despite the fact that he is the head of a non-Catholic Church. To them we must say, in addition to what has been stated so far, that such a position separates Pope from Church, which is impossible.


Pope Benedict 16th (2005-2013) [Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger]

Benedict 16th is Joseph Ratzinger. Joseph Ratzinger was one of the most radical theologians at Vatican 2, where his ideas were influential in guiding the revolutionary course of the council.

At Vatican 2, Ratzinger hung around with notorious heretics such as Karl Rahner. And even though he was a priest, Joseph Ratzinger showed up at Vatican 2 not in clerical garb, but in a suit and tie.

Ratzinger was named a “cardinal” by Paul 6th in 1977, and became Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith five years later.

During these years, Ratzinger wrote a staggering number of books. The heresies from Ratzinger that will be covered here come from having read many of his speeches and 24 books written by him.

Many Catholics are familiar with the fact that in the year 2000 the Vatican allegedly revealed the Third Secret of Fatima. Most traditionalists immediately recognized that the so-called “Third Secret” which the Vatican released was not the real Third Secret of Fatima, but rather that a massive fraud had been perpetrated on the world. The primary author of the document which attempted to convince the world of this fraud against Our Lady’s message at Fatima was Joseph Ratzinger, Benedict 16th.

The document on the so-called “Third Secret,” entitled The Message of Fatima, was authored by Ratzinger and “Cardinal” Bertone. It was an attempt to “debunk” the Message of Fatima, as the Los Angeles Times was forced to admit. In the document, Ratzinger referred to only one Fatima scholar, Fr. Edouard Dhanis. Fr. Dhanis held that large portions of the Message of Fatima were fabrications of Lucy. By referring to Dhanis as his Fatima “expert,” Ratzinger showed that he also holds that the Message of Fatima is a fabrication.
This reveals one of the primary characteristics of Ratzinger. He is a deceiver. He will give the appearance of devotion to something (e.g. Fatima), while trying to rip apart its meaning. He will give the appearance of conservatism, while inculcating the most abominable heresies. We will now cover the astounding heresies of Joseph Ratzinger, Benedict 16th.






* BENEDICT 16th NOT ONLY DENIES THE DOGMA THAT NON-CATHOLICS NEED TO BELIEVE IN THE PAPACY, BUT QUESTIONS WHETHER POPES HAVE SUPREME JURISDICTION IN THE CHURCH, AT ALL! The fact that this man now claims to be the pope when he doesn’t even believe in the Papacy is surely one of the greatest frauds in human history. Those who obstinately hold that this non-Catholic is the pope assist in perpetuating that monumental fraud.


* BENEDICT 16th and CARDINAL KASPER BOTH REJECT THE ECUMENISM OF THE RETURN – CONVERTING PROTESTANTS. The notorious heretic “Cardinal” Kasper, and Benedict 16th both blatantly reject the “ecumenism of the return,” that is, that non-Catholics need to return to the Catholic Church by conversion and reject their heretical sects. [So,]Benedict 16th joins Paul 6th and John Paul 2 in praising the overturning of the excommunications against the “Orthodox” – and therefore in denying Vatican 1. [1870]

* BENEDICT 16th prays ecumenical Vespers with schismatics and Protestants and says he loves the schismatic Orthodox Church.

* BENEDICT 16th’s worst heresy? He prays with the leader of the world’s “Orthodox” schismatics and signs a Joint Declaration with him telling him he’s in the Church of Christ.

* BENEDICT 16th even encourages the Schismatic Patriarch to Resume His Ministry.

* BENEDICT 16th says that Christodoulos, the schismatic, non-Catholic “Orthodox” bishop in Greece, has authority over all of Greece!

* BENEDICT 16th explicitly rejects converting Protestants.

* BENEDICT 16th goes to the Lutheran temple and takes active part in a “common prayer” service (his words) with Lutherans, other Protestants and “Orthodox” schismatics. This is a manifestation of heresy by deed – attendance at a non-Catholic Lutheran temple.

* BENEDICT 16th encourages the invalid head of the Anglican Church in his “ministry” and says the Anglican Sect is grounded in Apostolic Tradition.




* BENEDICT 16th PRAISES THE NON-CATHOLIC ECUMENICAL MONASTERY OF TAIZE AND SAYS MORE SHOULD BE FORMED. The ecumenical Monastery of Taize is located in France. It is a monastery made up of over a hundred brothers from various non-Catholic denominations, including Protestants.

* BENEDICT 16th GAVE COMMUNION TO THE PROTESTANT FOUNDER OF TAIZE, public heretic, Bro. Roger Schutz, the Protestant founder of Taize.



















* BENEDICT 16th CRITICIZES AS “HOTHEADS” THOSE WHO DESTROYED PAGAN TEMPLES. Those “hotheads” whom he criticizes would include St. Francis Xavier and St. Benedict.




















* BENEDICT 16th RESPECTS HANS KUNG’S PATH OF DENIAL OF JESUS CHRIST! For those who don’t know, Hans Kung denies Papal Infallibility and the Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, among other things. Hans Kung can correctly be described as an Arian, since he denies that Our Lord is of the same substance as the Father.

* BENEDICT 16th SAYS IT’S IMPORTANT THAT EVERY PERSON CAN BELONG TO THE RELIGION OF HIS CHOICE. In other words, life is more than material being; there is a spiritual reality, so it’s important to embrace a religion – any religion of your choice! What an apostate!



* BENEDICT 16th has been photographed giving the El Diablo satanic sign. This satanic gesture is popular among Satanists and satanic rock groups. [Essentially, it is one hand extended out like a wave, but held still, with the ring and middle fingers folded down, for the other person[s] to see.]


Since he is a heretic, he could not have been a validly elected pope. As quoted already, Pope Paul 4th solemnly taught in his Feb. 15, 1559 Bull, Cum ex Apostolatus officio, that it is impossible for a heretic to be validly elected pope.
Therefore, according to the teaching of the Catholic Church, Benedict 16th is not a pope, but a non-Catholic antipope whom Catholics must completely reject. He presides over the new religion of Vatican 2, a counterfeit Catholicism that has abandoned the Catholic Church’s traditions and dogmas.

One of Benedict 16th’s main characteristics is that he is a deceiver. While he teaches undeniable, astounding and manifest heresies, one of the ways by which he has convinced so many that he is conservative is that, among these astounding heresies in his writings, there are many conservative passages. But this is nothing new. Pope Pius 6th pointed out that heretics, inspired by the Devil, have always used such tactics to inculcate heresies and deceive people.

Pope Pius 6th, Bull “Auctorem fidei,” August 28, 1794: “[The Ancient Doctors] knew the capacity of innovators in the art of deception. In order not to shock the ears of Catholics, they sought to hide the subtleties… by the use of seemingly innocuous words such as would allow them to insinuate error into souls in the most gentle manner. Once the truth had been compromised, they could, by means of slight changes or additions in phraseology, distort the confession of the faith which is necessary for our salvation, and lead the faithful by subtle errors to their eternal damnation.”

Pope Pius 6th points out that camouflaging the heresies in statements that are ambiguous or seemingly conservative or contradictory was the tactic of the heretic Nestorius, and that Catholics cannot allow heretics to get away with this or deceive them by it. They must hold such heretics to their heresies regardless.


Pope Francis (2013- ) [Jorge Mario Bergoglio]

On March 13, 2013 Jorge Bergoglio from Argentina was elected antipope Francis of the Vatican II sect. [Both of Pope Francis' parents are Italian.]
Francis is the first 'pope' elected whose priestly ordination is called into serious question, since he was 'ordained' following the sweeping Ordination Reforms by 'Pope' Paul 6th, in his Pontificalis Romani, on June 18, 1968. Francis was ordained on December 13, 1969.

This brief overview will prove, from Francis’ words and actions, that he is a heretic. We will be quoting from the Vatican’s official newspaper L’Osservatore Romano and two of Francis’ books that document his beliefs on various topics – Conversations with Jorge Bergoglio and On Heaven and Earth.


* FRANCIS-- PRAISES THE APOSTATE CARDINAL KASPER. Many in the Vatican 2 “Church” call Kasper, “The Pope’s Theologian”.

* FRANCIS-- EXPRESSES JOY FOR SCHISMATICS, AND ESTEEM FOR MUSLIMS. However, since Muslims reject the Holy Trinity, they do not invoke God.

* FRANCIS-- “all are duty bound” to promote religious freedom, and protect the right of everyone to promote false beliefs about God.




* FRANCIS-- does not believe that homosexuals are in mortal sin and on the road to eternal damnation. He ends his statement on homosexuality by saying that God doesn’t necessarily reject the homosexual.

* FRANCIS-- DO NOT PROSELYTIZE [spread the Catholic Faith].



* FRANCIS-- “Proselytism is downright nonsense; it doesn’t make any sense.” He is teaching the opposite of what Jesus proclaimed and the Catholic Church has taught for two thousand years.

* FRANCIS-- 'ESTEEMED' FALSE RELIGION OF JUDAISM. He ends by saying that we must not forget souls that died in rejection of Jesus, and therefore were damned. He says we must “keep them alive in our prayers,” even though Jesus has revealed that such people do not have life.

* FRANCIS-- CHOOSE GOOD AND EVIL AS YOU UNDERSTAND IT. “And now I repeat it. Everyone has his own idea of Good and Evil and he has to choose to follow the Good and to fight Evil as he understands it. This would be enough to improve the world… It is not proselytism.”

* FRANCIS-- all of us should be grateful to Jews for preserving “their faith in God”. Francis then repeats his heretical teaching that people must simply follow their conscience (not the Catholic faith). He teaches that “the unbeliever” will be saved simply by “obeying his or her conscience”, and that sin only happens if someone doesn’t follow his or her conscience. This is apostasy from the Catholic faith.


* FRANCIS-- celebrated the first anniversary of a Bulgarian Schismatic, on his canonical election, who is inside the One True Church!





* FRANCIS-- PRAYS WITH SCHISMATICS, and allows the use our Catholic Churches.


* FRANCIS-- PROMOTES THE DEMONIC "Charismatic movement". The antipopes of the Vatican 2 sect have repeatedly promoted the demonic “Charismatic” movement. However, the movement was not willed by the Holy Spirit, but rather the Devil. The “Charismatic” movement is not Catholic and is the product of an evil spirit. True Catholics know and believe that the gift of the Holy Spirit is given in Confirmation. Many “Charismatics”, on the other hand, believe that people receive the gift of the Holy Spirit in the “rites” of “the Charismatic movement”. They believe the “spirit” is transmitted when one is “slain in the spirit”, etc. It’s the devil’s substitute for Confirmation. That’s why people receive the Devil, instead of the Holy Spirit, when they participate in such rites. At some of these meetings people have oinked like pigs, barked like dogs, rolled on the ground, laughed hysterically, etc. Antipope Francis closes his heretical address by saying that “Catholic charismatics” rejoice “in what the Holy Spirit is accomplishing in the other [non-Catholic] Churches”. His statement means that the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Truth, is responsible for heretical and schismatic “churches”. That is heresy.

* FRANCIS-- [My] first service is this: to be the Bishop of Rome.” Question for Francis: “Where is Bergoglio’s Church headed?” "THANK GOD, I HAVE NO CHURCH..." This interview was published on June 29, 2014. It’s a public statement that he is not a member of the Catholic Church, and that he is not the pope.



* FRANCIS-- ECHOES 1986, 'Spirit of Assisi', AT ANTWERP, BELGIUM. Here Francis clearly endorses the false worship of non-Catholic religions. In fact, by promoting the demonic “spirit of Assisi”, Francis actually endorses idolatry and worships false gods himself; for he promotes that the worship of false gods in non-Christian religions (which occurred at Assisi) has “power”, is “enriching”, and is to be promoted. Francis also endorses prayer with the unbelievers and members of false religions. He says that prayer with them “can forge lasting bonds of unity”. Francis is an idolater and an apostate. He is following Antipope John Paul 2’s example in that regard.

* FRANCIS-- heretics, Muslims, and members of “other religions” are "martyrs". Francis says that heretics, Muslims, and members of “other religions” who died embracing their false religions were “martyrs”. That is to teach that Muslims are martyrs!

* FRANCIS-- DECEASED “martyred” MUSLIMS “bore witness to God”.


* FRANCIS-- Francis blasphemes the Holy Spirit by saying that He is the author of various heretical and schismatic sects and “Churches”.

* FRANCIS-- Francis says there are many non-Catholic martyrs. At the Council of Florence, [1441], Pope Eugene IV infallibly proclaimed that non-Catholics who even shed their blood “for Christ” go to Hell.

* FRANCIS-- EVERYONE IN CEMETERIES IS IN HEAVEN. No one is lost or even in Purgatory, according to him.


* FRANCIS-- worry about “offending” the Earth, more than offending Almighty God. Francis has promoted this kind of pantheistic nonsense in the past. It is heretical.

* FRANCIS-- EVERYONE GOES TO HEAVEN, "We will all be there together". This seems to be very similar to what the apostate Antipope John Paul 2 taught.

* FRANCIS- TAUGHT BY A MUFTI, THEN PRAYED AT A MOSQUE. Saint Thomas Aquinas taught that if anyone were to worship at the tomb of Mohammed, he would be deemed an apostate.

* FRANCIS- that Anglicans “saints” were “canonized 50 years ago”.

* FRANCIS- it was good for a “parish priest” to push for the canonization of a Lutheran “pastor”!

* FRANCIS wants to find “a form of Primacy that we can agree on”. Francis is willing to further deny the Papacy to appease the schismatic “Orthodox” church. What an abomination.

* FRANCIS condemns Pope Saint Leo IX’s excommunication of Michael Cerularius, the “Patriarch” of Constantinople.

* FRANCIS teaches that “Catholics” must fully embrace those who hold heretical positions. He shouts, “accept differences!”

* FRANCIS teaches that the unity of the Body of Christ is a unity between “Catholics” and those “Christians” who reject Catholic teachings. That is a clear profession that Protestants, etc. are in the Body of Christ – a total rejection of Catholic dogma.


* FRANCIS PRAISES THE RENOUNED HERETIC PREACHER JAN HUS. Jan Hus was condemned as a heretic by the Catholic Church at the Council of Constance. In 1415 he was burned at the stake for heresy against Catholic teachings, including those on ecclesiology, the Eucharist, and other theological topics.

* FRANCIS says that he can “understand” people who blaspheme and say: “There is no God, God does not exist”!

* FRANCIS says that he has “respect” and “esteem” for those who reject Jesus. He is an apostate.

* FRANCIS declares that “Catholics” must pray with non-Catholics. The antipope thus encourages mortally sinful activity and promotes heresy.

* FRANCIS teaches that we must respect false religions and those who reject Jesus.

* FRANCIS says that “Catholics” must oppose “a rigid uniformity”.

* FRANCIS promotes the heresy that people should “worship” God in whatever way their conscience dictates.

* FRANCIS says that he is “certain” God understood and welcomed into Heaven a woman who “blasphemed God”, lost “her faith”, and “died an atheist”! In regard to the blaspheming atheist, Francis says: “I understand her” and God “understands her”.

* FRANCIS says his Counter Church has “esteem” for the “believers” of every false religion on earth. Francis encourages those who worship false gods to pray according to their own false religious traditions. Francis calls them “believers” and says they must pray to their false gods. Francis says prayer is their “treasure”.


* FRANCIS “For the Church, to be missionary does not mean to proselytize…”

Jesus laid down this command in Mark 16:16: “And he said to them: Go into the whole world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He who believes and is baptized shall be saved: but he who does not believe shall be condemned.” This is the gospel teaching revealed by God. If you are a Catholic, you have to believe it. Antipope Francis and the other antipopes of the Vatican II sect, however, preach a new gospel which tells people not to attempt to convert others. Francis is a non-Catholic antipope and anathematized.

* FRANCIS affirms the apostasy of the Vatican II sect: “that there is no intent on the part of the [Vatican 2] Church to convert Jews”.

* FRANCIS: “Many think differently, feel differently, seeking or meeting God in different ways. In this crowd, in this range of religions, there is only one certainty we have for all: we are all children of God.”

All of humanity was created by God, but the Catholic Church has infallibly taught throughout history that it is only through Baptism and the Catholic faith that we become Christians and children of God. However, as we can see, Francis tells all the members of various false religions that they can be certain they are “children of God”. Antipope Francis completely rejects Catholic teaching.

* FRANCIS and Antipope Paul 6th have declared that the Church’s formal excommunication has now been eliminated, and that the “Orthodox” are not excommunicated at all. The Catholic Church and the Vatican 2 Church are two different churches.

The Catholic Church is true, and the Vatican 2 sect is false.

* FRANCIS: “Justification takes place by grace alone, by faith alone..." This Lutheran heresy of faith alone was condemned numerous times at the Council of Trent. But the heretic Francis agrees with the Lutherans on justification.

* FRANCIS: "With them we walked through the Holy Door of this Basilica… we feel that our humble request is sustained by the intercession of the multitudes of Christian martyrs, past and present. They responded generously to the call of the Lord, they bore faithful witness with their lives..." In the “homily” here, Francis also proclaims that there are “multitudes” of non-Catholic martyrs. This is heresy.

* FRANCIS: "Accordingly the document affirms the integrity of the Jewish faith and understanding of Scripture and that there is no intent on the part of the Church to convert Jews."

* FRANCIS says he is happy to be back in the synagogue – a building dedicated to a false religion that rejects Catholicism and Jesus Christ. The apostate Francis says that in Buenos Aires he would visit synagogues and “would follow the Jewish festivals and commemorations and give thanks to the Lord”.


* FRANCIS Calls ‘Patriarch’ of the Ethiopian ‘Orthodox’ Tewahedo ‘Church "Your Holliness", over and over again!

* FRANCIS: [We feel] "the need for the shared labor of Catholics and Orthodox," Here Francis teaches that Catholics and the “Orthodox” share labor in spreading the gospel. This is another indication that Francis believes that both Catholics and the “Orthodox” are part of the one true Church!

* FRANCIS: "Orthodox and Catholics share the same conception of the family" ...he says that “Catholics” and the “Orthodox” have the same views about the family. But the “Orthodox” allow divorce and “remarriage”.

* FRANCIS ON THE EMERGING THREAT OF THE ZIKA VIRUS: "Regarding a ‘lesser evil’: preventing pregnancy is one thing — we are speaking in terms of the conflict between the 5th and 6th Commandments. The great Paul VI, in a difficult situation in Africa, allowed nuns to use a form of artificial contraception amid the violence… preventing pregnancy is not an absolute evil, ..." He even says that the “great Paul 6th” allowed “Catholic nuns” to use artificial contraception! This is a very evil and revealing statement from the apostate Antipope Francis.


* FRANCIS- "all of us, together: Muslims, Hindus, Catholics, Copts, Evangelicals, but brothers and sisters, children of the same God… you, we, everyone together, different religions, different cultures, but children of the same Father, brothers and sisters…"

* FRANCIS- was asked whether or not there has been any change in the discipline concerning reception of the sacraments by the divorced and remarried.

Francis: “I could say ‘yes’ and leave it at that. But that would be too brief a response. I recommend that all of you read the presentation made by Cardinal Schönborn, a great theologian.”

Francis is asked if there has been a change in regard to giving “Communion” to those who are divorced and “remarried”. He responds that “yes” – a change has indeed been made. This was clear from the words of Francis’ heretical document Amoris Laetitia. It has also been proven by a recent letter “leaked” by a “priest” in Argentina. Francis wrote to this Argentinian “priest” (on 9/5/16) and said there is “no other interpretation” of Amoris Laetitia other than admitting divorced and “remarried Catholics” to “Holy Communion” in some cases. In other words, according to Francis, the only interpretation of his document Amoris Laetitia is that it allows unrepentant adulterers to receive “Holy Communion”.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10- “Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.”


* FRANCIS- “A state must be secular. Confessional states end badly." Francis says that states must be secular. He also says that “confessional states”, in which the Church and the state were not divided (such as Catholic states in history), “end badly”. This is completely heretical. Many popes throughout history have directly condemned what Antipope Francis is teaching. Notice that Francis’ statement that a state must be “secular” was precisely condemned by Pope Leo 13th. Pope Leo 13th taught that the state cannot be godless or secular, or treat various religions alike.

* FRANCIS- “I would reaffirm the position of the Church against the death penalty." Francis wants to reaffirm “the position of the Church against the death penalty”. The position of the Catholic Church is not “against the death penalty”, but for the death penalty. Francis’ statement is completely heretical. The Catholic Church has always supported the legitimacy of the death penalty for extremely grave crimes. [In fact,] The Church has taught that putting heretics to death has been a just way to carry out the death penalty, because heretics lead others into heresy, schism, and everlasting hell-fire.


His June 16, 2016 answer to a question about educating young persons about marriage:

“A social fact in Buenos Aires: I forbade performing religious marriages in Buenos Aires, in cases that we call ‘matrimonios de apuro’, ‘shotgun’ [rushed] weddings, when a child is on the way."

"Now things are changing, but there is this: socially everything must be in order, a baby is coming, let’s get married. I forbade doing this, because they are not free, they are not free! Perhaps they love each other. And I have seen beautiful cases, in which then, after two or three years, they got married, and I saw them enter the church, dad, mom and baby, holding hands…"

"Another one of my experiences in Buenos Aires: the pastors, when they held preparation courses, there were always 12 or 13 couples, no more, they did not reach 30 people."

"The first question they asked: ‘How many of you are living together?’. The majority raised their hands. They prefer to live together, and this is a challenge, it calls for work. Not to say straight away: ‘Why don’t you get married in Church?’. No. Accompany them: wait and cultivate. And cultivate fidelity."

"In the Argentine countryside, in the Northeastern region, there is a superstition: that couples have a child, they live together. In the countryside this happens. Then, when the child must go to school, they have a civil marriage. And then, as grandparents, they have a religious marriage."

"It is a superstition, because they say that having a religious wedding straight away scares the husband! We must also fight against these superstitions. Yet really, I say that I have seen a great deal of fidelity in these cohabiting couples, a great deal of fidelity; and I am certain that this is a true marriage.”

Francis discourages new couples from getting married. He encourages them to commit mortal sins by fornicating for a while to “cultivate fidelity”. According to Francis, after couples have fornicated for a long enough period of time to “cultivate fidelity”, they can then think of getting married. Francis expresses great joy in describing the fornicating couple entering the church with their baby born out of wedlock.

Francis calls these situations “beautiful cases”. Francis also clearly teaches that these unmarried couples that consistently and “faithfully” fornicate have a real marriage! Francis says, “I am certain that this is a true marriage”! This is outrageous heresy! Francis is a heretical abomination.

Francis arbitrarily says quick weddings in Argentina “very often” “were null”. Since Francis is not a Catholic, he doesn’t understand that the Catholic Church presumes marriages to be valid, not invalid. Of course, the indissolubility of marriage is another Catholic teaching that the Vatican 2 sect rejects. Francis goes on to recommend that the fornicating couples should “continue in their relationship”. He therefore teaches that they should continue to fornicate, commit mortal sins, and live in a state of damnation. Francis doesn’t tell them they must separate until marriage, but that “they ought to continue in their [sinful] relationship”.

* FRANCIS- "...more important than belonging to the Apostolic Church or the Catholic Church, is ‘being Armenian’"

* FRANCIS- “I think that Martin Luther’s intentions were not mistaken; he was a reformer… we see that the Church was not exactly a model to emulate."

Francis declares the infamous Martin Luther “a reformer”. Francis says the Catholic Church “was not exactly a model to emulate”. Francis says the arch-heretic Martin Luther was also intelligent and justified his reasons for leaving the Catholic Church. Francis makes the outrageously heretical statement that: “Lutherans and Catholics, and all Protestants, are in agreement on the doctrine of justification”. Francis then speaks about Luther’s rejection of the Catholic Church’s infallible teaching on justification. Francis says Luther “on this very important point he was not mistaken”! Antipope Francis says that Luther’s new heretical teaching on justification offered a “remedy” for the Catholic Church! Francis proclaims that the heretics Zwingli and Calvin were also reformers of the Church. Francis again says that we should work and pray with Protestants.


Cindy Wooden: “Thank you, Your Holiness. In the last few days, Cardinal Marx from Germany ... said that the Catholic Church should apologize to the gay community for having marginalized these persons. In the days following the Orlando killings, many people have said that the Christian community has something to do with this hatred towards these persons. What do you think?”

Francis: “I will repeat what I said during my first trip, and I also repeat what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says, namely that they should not be discriminated against, that they should be shown respect and given pastoral assistance. We can disapprove of some ways of acting that are a little too offensive to other people, not for ideological reasons but in terms, we might say, of political propriety. But none of this has to do with the problem: if the problem is that a person is so inclined, and with good will seeks God, who are we to judge him or her? We should be helpful to them, in accordance with the teaching of the Catechism. The Catechism is clear! There are traditions in some countries, in some cultures with a different approach to the problem. I think that the Church should apologize – as that ‘Marxist’ Cardinal said [Cardinal Reinhold Marx] – not only to this person who is gay and has been offended, but also to the poor, to women and to children exploited in the workplace, and for having blessed so many weapons. The Church should apologize for all the times she has not acted… – and when I say ‘the Church’, I mean Christians; the Church is holy, we are sinners! Christians should apologize for not having helped with so many decisions, helped so many families… I remember from my childhood the culture of Buenos Aires, the insular Catholic culture which I come from. You could not enter the home of a divorced couple! I am talking about eighty years ago. The culture has changed, thank God. As Christians we should apologize over and over again, and not just for this.”

Francis says that homosexuals “should be shown respect”. Francis says that sodomy is a way of acting that is “a little too offensive to other people”. Francis doesn’t say sodomy is offensive to him, but “to other people”. What an apostate. Francis then utters the heresy, “who are we to judge him or her?” This statement clearly means that he won’t say they are in grave sin. Francis then says that he thinks the Catholic Church “should apologize” to “this person who is gay and has been offended”. Francis is a reprobate.



“To want to innovate and change the parish structure? What I am saying may seem heretical, but it is how I see things. I believe the parish structure is analogous to the episcopal structure, different but analogous. The parish cannot be touched; it has to remain as a place of creativity, a reference point, a mother, all these things. It is where that inventiveness has to find expression. When a parish does all this, it becomes – with regard to missionary disciples – what I call a ‘parish that goes forth’… I don’t know if this is a simplistic answer, but I don’t have any other. I’m not a brilliant pastoral theologian, I just say whatever comes to mind."

* FRANCIS says that “Catholics” need to “acknowledge our sins against creation”, because “we all generate small ecological damage”. This is heretical nonsense.


* FRANCIS says the “Catholic Church” is not in opposition to other false religions, but in cooperation with them. Francis expresses respect for false religions and says that demonic non-Catholic religions “have an enormous task” helping people to understand “the meaning of life”. Francis utters the heresy that no “religion” can ever lend support to disagreements. Francis says that non-Catholic “religions” allow “a light to shine through, indispensable for living”. Non-Catholic religions allow darkness and evil to shine through. They are indispensable to the Devil’s program to damn souls. Francis calls false religions “seeds of rebirth amid the devastation of death”. False religions lead those who follow them to the devastation of eternal death in Hell.

* FRANCIS says that “Catholics” should never attempt to convert someone of the schismatic “Orthodox” faith. He says that it’s a “grave sin” to do so. Francis calls these schismatics “disciples” of Jesus Christ. He also says that “Catholics” should walk and pray with them. By his words Francis reasserts his position that a conversion from “Orthodox” to “Catholic” is meaningless and should never happen.


Joshua McElwee: “I would like to ask what would you say to a person who has suffered for years with his or her sexuality and truly feels that it is a biological problem, that his or her physical makeup does not correspond to what he or she considers his or her sexual identity? As a pastor and minister, how would you accompany these people?”

Francis: “First of all, in my life as a priest, as a bishop – and also as Pope – I have accompanied many people with homosexual tendencies and also homosexual activity. I have accompanied them, I have brought them closer to the Lord; some cannot do it, but I have always accompanied them and never abandoned anyone."

"This is what has to be done. Individuals have to be accompanied, as Jesus accompanies them. When a person who has this condition comes before Jesus, Jesus certainly does not say: ‘Go away because you are homosexual.’ No. What I was talking about has to do with the mischief going on these days with the indoctrination of gender theory."

"A French father told me that he was at the table speaking to his children – he is Catholic, his wife is Catholic, the children are Catholic, lukewarm Catholics, but Catholics – and he asked his ten-year old son: ‘And what do you want to be when you grow up?’ – ‘A girl.’ And his father realized that the schoolbooks were teaching gender theory. This is against the realities of nature."

"It is one thing if a person has this tendency, this option; some people even change sex. But it is another thing to teach this in schools, in order to change people’s way of thinking. I call this ‘ideological colonization.’"

"Last year I received a letter from a Spanish man who told me his story from the time when he was a child. He was born a female, a girl, and he suffered greatly because he felt that he was a boy but physically was a girl. He told his mother, when he was in his twenties, at 22, that he wanted to have an operation and so forth. His mother asked him not to do so as long as she was alive. She was elderly, and died soon after. He had the operation. He is a municipal employee in a town in Spain. He went to the bishop. The bishop helped him a great deal, he is a good bishop and he ‘wasted’ time to accompany this man. Then he got married. He changed his civil identity, he got married and he wrote me a letter saying that it would bring comfort to him to come see me with his bride: he, who had been she, but is he. I received them. They were pleased.”

Francis clearly teaches an abominable falsehood that Jesus will accept homosexuals. Francis indicates he doesn’t have a problem with those who have these unnatural inclinations or even those who get a “sex change” and then get “married”. The apostate Francis says that he received them and “they were pleased”. Francis endorses the “sex change” of a biological female who perversely attempts to be a male. He repeatedly calls the woman “he”! He even endorses the “transgender marriage” of that female who pretends to be a male! He is an abominable apostate.

* FRANCIS teaches that we can discover “the deep Christian faith and holiness” in the heresy and schism of Anglicanism. Francis once again promotes prayer with these non-Catholics which the Catholic Church has always taught is a mortal sin. Francis officially teaches his followers that “not only can we pray together, we must pray together”. Francis then teaches that Anglicanism is a faith he shares.

* FRANCIS: At the end of this month, God willing, I will go to Lund, Sweden, and together with the Lutheran World Federation, we will commemorate, after five centuries, the beginning of Luther’s reformation, and thank the Lord…”

* FRANCIS: “It is with sentiments of heartfelt closeness that I join all those who celebrate, with joy and jubilation, the 25th anniversary this year of the election of His All-Holiness Bartholomew [I. Francis, Orthodox” Patriarch of Constantinople], as ecumenical patriarch.

* FRANCIS says Luther and his followers were of “sincere will to profess and uphold the true faith”. Francis says “Catholics” should have simply accepted Martin Luther’s decision to create a new “religion”. Luther’s new, false, man-made “Christian” religion led countless souls to embrace his counterfeit Christianity.

* FRANCIS promoted the mortally sinful activity of praying with Lutherans and “commemorating the five hundredth anniversary of the Reformation”. Francis promotes a joint statement of faith with Lutherans. The total heretic and schismatic Francis then says he is “profoundly thankful for the spiritual and theological gifts received through the Reformation”!

* FRANCIS: “… unity is a grace that one must ask for, and it’s also why I say that every form of proselytism among Christians is sinful. The Church never grows through proselytism… Proselytism among Christians itself is therefore a serious sin for Christians.”

Question: “Why?”

Francis: “Because it contradicts the very dynamic by which we become and remain Christians. The Church is not a soccer team in search of fans”

* FRANCIS: “We need peace in the Church; all of the Churches need peace; all religions need to grow in peace, because all religions are messengers of peace, but they must grow in peace. Help them, each of you within your own religion.” Francis believes that Islam and Satanism “are messengers of peace” because, according to him, “all religions are messengers of peace”.


* FRANCIS: Francis wants to recall the 500th anniversary of the Protestant revolution “in a special way”. He describes it as “an event that divided Christians”.

In reality it wasn’t an event that divided Christians, but the separation of heretics, through their embrace of heresy, from true Christians (Catholics) and from the true Church. At the conclusion of Francis’ address, he calls the heretical Anglican representative “His Grace” and their non-Catholic leader (a layman) “Archbishop”.

* FRANCIS [claims] that people who died outside the Catholic Church “dwell in the one heavenly Jerusalem”. He is a notorious heretic.


To say that he [Francis] is not a heretic, as the false traditionalists do, is an incredible blasphemy. Yet, it has become obvious that most “Catholics” who have seen Francis’ heresies in word and deed, and still regard him as a Catholic, will never change their position, even if he taught heresy 50,000 times. That’s because they are faithless. Externals are more important to them than the teaching of Jesus Christ and His Church. They simply reject the Church’s teaching that only those who profess the true faith can be considered in the Church.

In fact, the dogmas Francis denies have been defined more frequently than the Church’s opposition to abortion. But that fact doesn’t make any difference to those false traditionalists. Almost every month or week, they will come out and complain or laugh about Francis’ latest blasphemy. They will endlessly whine about how Francis’ outrageous teaching is contrary to what true popes have taught throughout history. They will mock his false teaching and his false faith, failing to realize that they are only mocking themselves; for by recognizing him as a Catholic and the leader of the faithful, they simultaneously profess that his “faith” (and thus what they mock) is true. Nevertheless, since they are evil, they will continue to profess that the wolf (Francis) has authority over the sheep, and that he is not a heretic.

Their position is wicked, heretical, theologically ridiculous, and spiritually bankrupt. They are on the road to Hell, and they lead others to Hell. Those who hold this position (promoting heretics as Catholics) and those who follow such blind guides, who don’t serve Jesus Christ or believe in His faith, will pay the ultimate price in the eternal lake of fire.




The Great Apostasy and a counterfeit
Church predicted in the New Testament and in Catholic Prophecy:

Luke 18:8- “But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he
find, think you, faith on earth?”

In the Gospel, Our Lord Jesus Christ informs us that in the last days the true Faith would hardly be found on the earth. He tells us that “in the holy place” itself there will be “the abomination of desolation” (Mt. 24:15), and a deception so profound that, if it were possible, even the elect would be deceived (Mt. 24:24).

Matthew 24:15- “When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place: he that readeth let him understand.”

Matthew 24:24-25- “For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Behold I have told it to you, beforehand.”

2 Thess. 2:3-5- “Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt [apostasy] first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition, Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God. Remember you not, that when I was yet with you, I told you these things?”

In 1903, Pope St. Pius X thought that he might be seeing the beginning of the evils which will fully come to pass in the last days.

Pope St. Pius X, E Supremi (# 5), Oct. 4, 1903: “… there is good reason to fear lest this great perversity may be as it were a foretaste, and perhaps the beginning of those evils which are reserved for the last days; and that there may already be in the world the ‘Son of Perdition’ of whom the Apostle speaks (2 Thess. 2:3).”

The New Testament tells us that this deception will happen in the very heart of the Church’s physical structures, in “the Temple of God” (2 Thess. 2:4) and “in the holy place” (Mt. 24:15).

It will arise because people receive not the love of the truth (2 Thessalonians 2:10).

In 2 Thessalonians 2, St. Paul speaks of the last days being characterized by a great apostasy that will be the worst ever – even worse than was experienced in the Arian crisis in the 4th century, in which an authentically Catholic priest was hardly to be found.

Fr. William Jurgens: “At one point in the Church’s history, only a few years before Gregory’s [Nazianz] present preaching (A.D. 380), perhaps the number of Catholic bishops in possession of sees, as opposed to Arian bishops in possession of sees, was no greater than something between 1% and 3% of the total. Had doctrine been determined by popularity, today we should all be deniers of Christ and opponents of the Spirit.”

Fr. William Jurgens: “In the time of the Emperor Valens (4th century), Basil was virtually the only orthodox Bishop in all the East who succeeded in retaining charge of his see… If it has no other importance for modern man, a knowledge of the history of Arianism should demonstrate at least that the Catholic Church takes no account of popularity and numbers in shaping and maintaining doctrine: else, we should long since have had to abandon Basil and Hilary and Athanasius and Liberius and Ossius and call ourselves after Arius.”

St. Gregory Nazianz (+380), Against the Arians: “Where are they who revile us for our poverty and pride themselves in their riches? They who define the Church by numbers and scorn the little flock?”

If the Arian crisis – just a prelude to the Great Apostasy – was this extensive, how extensive will the Great Apostasy foretold by Our Lord and Saint Paul be?
Prophecy of St. Nicholas of Fluh (1417-1487):

“The Church will be punished because the majority of her members, high and low, will become so perverted. The Church will sink deeper and deeper until she will at last seem to be extinguished, and the succession of Peter and the other Apostles to have expired. But, after this, she will be victoriously exalted in the sight of all doubters.”

St. Paul further says that this apostasy will result in a man sitting in the temple of God and “shewing himself as if he were God.” ...this is exactly what has happened by a man sitting in St. Peter’s Basilica declaring that he and everyone else is God.

Fr. Herman Kramer was a Catholic priest who spent 30 years studying and writing a book on the Apocalypse. In his book, he wrote the following about St. Paul’s prophecy concerning the Antichrist sitting in the Temple of God.

“St. Paul says that Antichrist ‘sitteth in the temple of God’… This is not the ancient Temple of Jerusalem, nor a temple like it built by Antichrist, as some have thought, for then it would be his own temple… this temple is shown to be a Catholic Church, possibly one of the churches in Jerusalem or St. Peter’s in Rome, which is the largest church in the world and is in the full sense ‘The Temple of God.’”

Notice that Kramer says that “the Temple of God” probably refers to St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome.

Pope Pius XI, Quinguagesimo ante (#30), Dec. 23, 1929: “… such a great number of them came to the Basilica of St. Peter’s for the jubilee of indulgence that We have probably never seen that great temple so crowded.”

The Catholic Encyclopedia article on “Antichrist” indicates that St. Bernard believed that the Antichrist would be an antipope:

“...St. Bernard speaks in the passage of the Antipope [as the Beast of the Apocalypse].”

Bl. Joachim (d. 1202): “Towards the end of the world, Antichrist will overthrow the pope and usurp his see.”

But whether or not one believes that the Antichrist will be an antipope, it has definitely been prophesied that the forces of Antichrist will overtake Rome in the final days. On Sept. 19, 1846, Our Lady of La Salette prophesied that Rome would lose the Faith and become the Seat of the Antichrist in a final days Apostasy from the one true Catholic Faith.

Our Lady of La Salette, Sept. 19, 1846: “Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Anti-Christ… the Church will be in eclipse.”

This startling prophecy coincides with the prophecies in Sacred Scripture (Apocalypse 17 and 18), which inform us that the city of seven hills (Rome) will become a harlot (a counterfeit Bride of Christ), which will commit spiritual fornication (idolatry) and tread upon the blood of the saints (false ecumenism). The great harlot prophesied in the Bible is not the Catholic Church; it is a counterfeit Catholic Church, an apostate, phony Bride which arises in the last days to deceive Catholics and eclipse the true Church which has been reduced to a remnant. ...we [] will bring forward the overwhelming, undeniable, irrefutable evidence from doctrinal grounds and unassailable facts that the “Church” which has arisen with the Second Vatican Council (1962- 1965) is not the Catholic Church at all, but rather a massively fraudulent Counter-Church which denies the fundamental teachings of the Catholic Church.

We will show that the men who imposed this new Vatican 2 religion and the New Mass were not Catholics at all, but manifest heretics preaching a new religion.

This may startle some, but this is a fact. Rome (not the Catholic Church) has lost the Faith (given way to a non-Catholic, counterfeit sect) and become the seat of the Antichrist.

In late 2001, the Pontifical Biblical Commission released a book entitled The Jewish People and the Holy Scriptures in the Christian Bible. The book argues that the Jews’ continued wait for the Messiah is validated and justified by the Old Testament.

“The expectancy of the Messiah was justified in the Old Testament,” papal spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls explained, “and if the Old Testament keeps its value, then it keeps that as a value, too. It says you cannot just say all the Jews are wrong and we are right.” Asked by reporters whether his statements might be taken to suggest that the Messiah may not in fact have come, Navarro-Valls replied, “It means it would be wrong for a Catholic to wait for the Messiah, but not for a Jew.” This means that the Vatican now holds that the Jews are perfectly free to reject Christ; this is the teaching of the Vatican 2 “popes.”

Rome has lost the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist.
1 John 2:22 – “Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, who denieth the Father, and the Son.”

But how did this come about, and what are Catholics to do about it?




The Catholic Church teaches that a heretic would cease to be pope, and that a heretic couldn’t be validly elected pope.

The Catholic Encyclopedia, “Heresy,” 1914, Vol. 7, p. 261: “The pope himself, if notoriously guilty of heresy, would cease to be pope because he would cease to be a member of the Church.”

Heresy is the obstinate denial or doubt by a baptized person of an article of divine and Catholic Faith. In other words, a baptized person who deliberately denies an authoritative teaching of the Catholic Church is a heretic. Martin Luther, perhaps the most notorious heretic in Church history, taught the heresy of Justification by faith alone, among many others. Besides antipopes reigning from Rome due to uncanonical elections, the Catholic Church teaches that if a pope were to become a heretic he would automatically lose his office and cease to be the pope. This is the teaching of all the doctors and fathers of the Church who addressed the issue:

St. Robert Bellarmine, Cardinal and Doctor of the Church, De Romano Pontifice, II, 30:

"A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction."

St. Robert Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice, II, 30:

"This principle is most certain. The non-Christian cannot in any way be Pope, as Cajetan himself admits (ib. c. 26). The reason for this is that he cannot be head of what he is not a member; now he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian, as is clearly taught by St. Cyprian (lib. 4, epist. 2), St. Athanasius (Scr. 2 cont. Arian.), St. Augustine (lib. De great. Christ. Cap. 20), St. Jerome (contra Lucifer.) and others; therefore the manifest heretic cannot be Pope."

St. Francis De Sales (17th century), Doctor of the Church, The Catholic Controversy, pp. 305-306:

"Now when he [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church..."

St. Antoninus (1459):

"In the case in which the pope would become a heretic, he would find himself, by that fact alone and without any other sentence, separated from the Church. A head separated from a body cannot, as long as it remains separated, be head of the same body from which it was cut off. A pope who would be separated from the Church by heresy, therefore, would by that very fact itself cease to be head of the Church. He could not be a heretic and remain pope, because, since he is outside of the Church, he cannot possess the keys of the Church." (Summa Theologica, cited in Actes de Vatican I. V. Frond pub.)

That a heretic cannot be a pope is rooted in the dogma that heretics are not members of the Catholic Church It should be noted that the teaching from the saints and doctors of the Church, which is quoted above – that a pope who became a heretic would automatically cease to be pope – is rooted in the infallible dogma that a heretic is not a member of the Catholic Church.

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino,” 1441:

“The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives…”

Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi (# 23), June 29, 1943:

“For not every sin, however grave it may be, is such as of its own nature to sever a man from the Body of the Church, as does schism or heresy or apostasy.”

We can see that it’s the teaching of the Catholic Church that a man is severed from the Church by heresy, schism or apostasy.

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9), June 29, 1896: “The practice of the Church has always been the same, as is shown by the unanimous teaching of the Fathers, who were wont to hold as outside Catholic communion, and alien to the Church, whoever would recede in the least degree from any point of doctrine proposed by her authoritative Magisterium.”

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 9):

“No one who merely disbelieves in all (these heresies) can for that reason regard himself as a Catholic or call himself one. For there may be or arise some other heresies, which are not set out in this work of ours, and, if any one holds to a single one of these he is not a Catholic.”

Pope Innocent III, Eius exemplo, Dec. 18, 1208:

“By the heart we believe and by the mouth we confess the one Church, not of heretics, but the Holy Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Church outside of which we believe that no one is saved.”

Thus, it’s not merely the opinion of certain saints and doctors of the Church that a heretic would cease to be pope; it’s a fact inextricably bound up with a dogmatic teaching. A truth inextricably bound up with a dogma is called a dogmatic fact. It is, therefore, a dogmatic fact that a heretic cannot be the pope. A heretic cannot be the pope, since one who is outside cannot head that of which he is not even a member.

Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (#15), June 29, 1896:

“No one, therefore, unless in communion with Peter can share in his authority, since it is absurd to imagine that he who is outside can command in the Church.”

Pope Paul IV issued a Papal Bull solemnly declaring that the election of a heretic as pope is null and void. In 1559 Pope Paul IV issued an entire Papal Bull dealing with the subject and the possibility of a heretic being elected pope. At the time that Paul 4th issued the Bull there were rumors that one of the cardinals was a secret Protestant. In order to prevent the election of such a heretic to the Papacy, Pope Paul 4th, in 1559, solemnly declared that a heretic cannot be validly elected pope. Below are the pertinent portions of the Bull: Pope Paul IV, Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Feb. 15, 1559:

“1… Remembering also that, where danger is greater, it must more fully and more diligently be counteracted, We have been concerned lest false prophets or others, even if they have only secular jurisdiction, should wretchedly ensnare the souls of the simple, and drag with them into perdition, destruction and damnation countless peoples committed to their care and rule, either in spiritual or in temporal matters; and We have been concerned also lest it may befall us to see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by the prophet Daniel, in the holy place. In view of this, Our desire has been to fulfill our Pastoral duty, insofar as, with the help of God, we are able, so as to arrest the foxes who are occupying themselves in the destruction of the vineyard of the Lord and to keep the wolves from the sheepfolds, lest We seem to be dumb watchdogs that cannot bark and lest We perish with the wicked husbandman and be compared with the hireling…

6. In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity We enact, determine, decree and define:-] that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy:

(i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless;

(ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation;

(iii) it shall not be held as partially legitimate in any way…

(vi) those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power…

10. No one at all, therefore, may infringe this document of our approbation, reintroduction, sanction, statute and derogation of wills and decrees, or by rash presumption contradict it. If anyone, however, should presume to attempt this, let him know that he is destined to incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles,

Peter and Paul.

Given in Rome at Saint Peter's in the year of the Incarnation of the Lord 1559, 15th February, in the fourth year of our Pontificate.

+ I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church…”

With the fullness of his papal authority, Pope Paul 4th declared that the election of a heretic is invalid, even if it takes place with the unanimous consent of the cardinals and is accepted by all.

Pope Paul 4th also declared that he was making this declaration in order to combat the arrival of the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel, in the holy place. This is astounding, and it seems to indicate that the Magisterium itself is connecting the eventual arrival of the abomination of desolation in the holy place (Matthew 24:15) with a heretic posing as the pope – perhaps because the heretic posing as the pope will give us the abomination of desolation in the holy place (the New Mass), as we believe is the case, or because the heretical antipope will himself constitute the abomination of desolation in the holy place.

The Catholic Encyclopedia repeats this truth declared by Pope Paul IV by asserting that the election of a heretic as pope would, of course, be completely null and void.

The Catholic Encyclopedia, “Papal Elections,” 1914, Vol. 11, p. 456:

"Of course, the election of a heretic, schismatic, or female [as Pope] would be null and void."

In line with the truth that a heretic cannot be the pope, the Church teaches that heretics cannot be prayed for in the canon of the Mass.

A pope is prayed for in the Te Igitur prayer of the canon of the Mass. But the Church also teaches that heretics cannot be prayed for in the canon of the Mass. If a heretic could be a true pope, there would be an insoluble dilemma. But it’s actually not a dilemma because a heretic cannot be a valid pope:

Libellus professionis fidei, April 2, 517, profession of faith prescribed under Pope St. Hormisdas:

“And, therefore, I hope that I may merit to be in the one communion with you, which the Apostolic See proclaims, in which there is the whole and the true solidity of the Christian religion, promising that in the future the names of those separated from the communion of the Catholic Church, that is, those not agreeing with the Apostolic See, shall not be read during the sacred mysteries. But if I shall attempt in any way to deviate from my profession, I confess that I am a confederate in my opinion with those whom I have condemned. However, I have with my own hand signed this profession of mine, and to you, HORMISDAS, the holy and venerable Pope of the City of Rome, I have directed it.”

Pope Benedict XIV, Ex Quo Primum (# 23), March 1, 1756:

“Moreover heretics and schismatics are subject to the censure of major excommunication by the law of Can. de Ligu. 23, quest. 5, and Can. Nulli, 5, dist. 19. But the sacred canons of the Church forbid public prayer for the excommunicated as can be seen in chap. A nobis, 2, and chap. Sacris on the sentence of excommunication. Though this does not forbid prayer for their conversion, still such prayer must not take the form of proclaiming their names in the solemn prayer during the sacrifice of the Mass.”

Pope Pius IX, Quartus Supra (# 9), January 6, 1873:

“For this reason John, Bishop of Constantinople, solemnly declared – and the entire Eighth Ecumenical Council did so later – ‘that the names of those who were separated from communion with the Catholic Church, that is of those who did not agree in all matters with the Apostolic See, are not to be read out during the sacred mysteries.’”







Since we can know what Satan wants us to do, thru Bayside, we need to do EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE!

The apparitions of Bayside, NY, in the 1970s and 1980s, are manifestly heretical, and for proof, go to the specific Bayside Page, by the Dimonds:

“Our Lady of Roses” of Bayside promotes the New Mass:

“Our Lady” of Bayside, Aug. 14, 1981, STAY IN YOUR PARISH:

“My heart, My Son’s heart has been grieved, as we go about the world… We can see a division bordering on schism… it is promoted by Satan… Do not judge My Son’s House, His Church, by the man, though he is a representative – legal, a legal representative of My Son… at the time that My Son comes in the Consecration, He shall not turn aside from you, My Son. Therefore, you cannot say that the Mass is invalid. This has brought great sorrow to Our Hearts, for many left the fold on this matter.” (Our Lady of the Roses (Blue Book), p. 83.)

“Our Lady” of Bayside, May 3, 1978, Stay in your parish:

“You will all remain in your Parish Churches.” (Our Lady of the Roses (Blue Book), p. 83.)

“Our Lady” of Bayside, Aug. 14, 1981, Stay in your parish:

“I have asked you in the past, and I ask and continue to beg you, My children, not to abandon your Vicar in Rome, and not to abandon your parish church.” (Our Lady of the Roses (Blue Book), p. 83.)

“Our Lord” of Bayside, Sept. 14, 1986, Traditionalists are being led astray:

“We hear all names coming forward to Our ears of churches being born anew, called the Traditional Roman Catholic Church. My child and My children, We need no more Traditionalists running around and creating new churches.” (Our Lady of the Roses (Blue Book), p. 104.)

The Devil wants people to stay with the counterfeit Church of the Vatican 2 sect. He wants people to stay with the invalid New Mass. This is the whole purpose of the Bayside Messages, and many similar false messages.

The Devil wants to keep conservative-minded “Catholics” inside the Vatican 2 parishes, in communion with the new Vatican 2 religion, and under the manifestly heretical and non-Catholic Vatican II antipopes.

In order to accomplish this, the Devil uses false seers such as Veronica Lueken. And in order to be ultra-effective, in the false messages that he gives them he includes conservative statements.

These conservative statements, such as encouraging the people to pray the Rosary, wear the Scapular, denounce Modernism, reject liturgical abuses, etc., are meant to deceive.

All of these things were part of the Bayside messages. And because people receive not the love of the truth (2 Thess. 2), God allows them to be deceived by the false signs that have occurred at these apparition sites. Sadly, the Devil’s plan has been incredibly effective.

We’ve been in contact with many who continue to attend the New Mass – while deploring its abuses, of course, as the Bayside Message instructs them – simply because they believe in Bayside.

They won’t hear Magisterial arguments which show that the New Mass is no Mass; rather, they just stick with Bayside. They dismiss all the proof that Paul 6th, John Paul 2 and Benedict 16th aren’t even Catholic; they just stick with Bayside.

I know of entire families who have been raised in the Conciliar religion – for instance, attending both the indult Mass and the New Mass, rather than strictly the Traditional Mass at an independent chapel – simply because they follow Bayside.

Unfortunately, it will cost them their salvation, since they have chosen to follow strange voices rather than the truth communicated through the teaching of the Catholic Church.

Below is just one of countless examples that could be given of a “conservative” message that the Devil spiced in among the Bayside messages. The Devil tells them to remain at the Vatican II parish and under the antipope, while also…

“Our Lady” of Bayside, Aug. 14, 1974 – Vatican 2:

“Satan was present – He listened with careful ears at the Great Council [Vatican 2]. He awaited every move, and he placed his agents among you! Recognize and reconstruct your path! You have been deluded.” (Our Lady of the Roses (Blue Book), p. 87.)

This tickles the ears of those who know that Vatican 2 caused the spiritual crisis. So the Devil tells them that there were problems with Vatican 2, while keeping them in the very sect that Vatican 2 created. It’s brilliant!

Veronica also said that it was revealed to her that if the Latin Mass were returned, the coming chastisement would be averted. Hence, the people are told that the Latin Mass is preferable, but the New Mass is also valid and should not be abandoned.

“Our Lady” of Bayside, July 25, 1985:

“…By the time We had reached you in Bayside, in your home, My Child, We had looked with Theresa a long time for a Veronica….the highest of heaven approach many souls to be messengers, voice-boxes, for the Eternal Father, through My Son…” (Our Lady of the Roses (Blue Book), p. 102.)

[Are we to believe that Our Lady couldn't find Veronica for a long time, so that she could be her voice-box?]

Veronica Lueken was chosen and used as a voice-box for the Devil. Her false messages, which contradict Catholic teaching, have had disastrous effects on innumerable souls.

For the most part, what is said in this article also applies to the many other false apparitions of the past few decades. It applies to the false apparitions at Medjugorje, which contain clear heresy; it applies to the false apparitions/locutions to Don Gobbi, John Leary, etc., etc., etc.

Some of these other apparitions are slightly more conservative, while some of them are slightly more liberal. The Devil has various flavors to appeal to different kinds of people, but they all deliver a false message on the post-Vatican 2 apostasy.

Almost all of them say similar things about John Paul 2.

In conclusion, these facts should show us the lengths to which Satan has gone (with God’s permission) to deceive people and keep them with the New Mass and the Vatican 2 antipopes, etc.

This should be a wake up call to us all about the gravity of the spiritual deception we are dealing with now.















The steps one must take to convert to the traditional Catholic Faith are actually simple. They are slightly different, however, depending upon whether one has or has not received baptism. Please consult this file carefully.


1) Know and believe the basic catechism (i.e. the basic teachings) of the traditional Catholic Faith. PLEASE READ THE CATHECHISM NOW. One should also immediately begin to pray the Rosary each day (15 decades preferably). If you don’t know how, consult the How to Pray the Rosary section of our website. Always take time every day to read and study the Faith, and ask God for final perseverance.

[Note- Which Catechism? THE CATECHISM OF THE COUNCIL OF TRENT, which is available online, at the end of this letter.]

2) Hold belief in all the traditional dogmas of the Church and the correct Catholic positions against the post-Vatican II sect (covered in detail in our material), including, for example, the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation (without exception), the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Papacy, Papal Infallibility, the necessity of water baptism, etc

3) After you know the basic catechism (which shouldn’t take very long), and are confident that you assent to all the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church, and that you are not living in mortal sin, nor have a will to continue living in mortal or venial sin, receive baptism. There is no reason to delay this (see Acts 8:36-37) if you have completed steps 1 and 2.

Normally this would be done by a Catholic priest at your local Catholic Church. Since we are in the Great Apostasy, and there are almost zero fully Traditional Catholic priests around, a layperson is probably the one who should do it for you.

The Council of Florence (see below) declared that anyone can validly administer baptism. Thus, if you have a strong Catholic friend or, in case you don’t, if you have a non-Catholic family member or friend who could perform the baptism reliably with the proper intention, then that person can administer baptism for you using the form given below. Confession is not necessary for a person who has never received baptism, since baptism removes original sin and all actual sins.

After baptism, however, one should get into the habit of going to confession to a traditional priest ordained in the traditional rite of ordination at least once a month if that is possible.

Sadly, however, today there are virtually not a single non-heretical priest left in the world. One must go to confession if a non-heretical priest is available if he or she commits a mortal sin after baptism, which hopefully will not occur. A good practice is to write down your sins on a piece of paper so that you will have an easier time remembering the sins you have committed.

This can also be done by those who have no priest and who confess directly to God, in order to facilitate that your confession to Our Lord will be as exact as possible. One could also make a confession of sins or heresies to any person or friend you feel you trust. This should generally be someone who is able to advice you on spiritual things, and not to any person you know. Confessing our sins to each other, even though we cannot give absolution, is still a great tool to use in exposing the devil and in overcoming habitual bad habits or sins (reoccurring or habitual bad habits is in most cases what lead people to sin in the first place). The Saints had as a habit to confess their sins daily, and thus we should try to act in this way as much as we are able. For confessing our sins daily, breeds humility.

4) Make the profession of faith for converts from the Council of Trent, which is below. If there is a specific sect to which you belonged, or if you believed in a specific heresy, add at the end that you also reject that heretical sect or heresy. See the last section below: The Council of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts.


1) Know and believe the basic catechism (i.e. the basic teachings) of the traditional Catholic Faith. PLEASE READ THE CATHECHISM NOW. One should also immediately begin to pray the Rosary each day (15 decades preferably). If you don’t know how, consult the How to Pray the Rosary section of our website. Always take time every day to read and study the Faith, and ask God for final perseverance.

[Note- Which Catechism? THE CATECHISM OF THE COUNCIL OF TRENT, which is available online, at the end of this letter.]

2) Hold belief in all the traditional dogmas of the Church and the correct Catholic positions against the post-Vatican 2 sect (covered in detail in our material), including, for example, the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation (without exception), the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Papacy, Papal Infallibility, the necessity of water baptism, etc..

3) Make the profession of faith for converts from the Council of Trent, which is below. If there is a specific sect to which you belonged, or if you believed in a specific heresy, add at the end that you also reject that heretical sect or heresy. See the last section below: The Council of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts.

4) If a non-heretical priest is available to you, you must make a general confession to a priest ordained in the traditional rite of ordination after taking the previous 3 steps.

This is a confession in which one mentions all mortal and venial sins committed after baptism that one can remember, including adherence to any sects or false religions or having spread a false sect or false religion.

Beware to check carefully beforehand that the priest you approach for the sacraments is not heretical nor in communion with other heretics.

Today, in the Great Apostasy, there is almost not a single non-heretical priest left in the world. The only alternative that is left for almost everyone today is to confess their sins to God directly and ask Him with tears or sorrow and true repentance to forgive them their sins.

This will forgive your sins if you are sincere, if no other option is available. If you find a non-heretical priest, then as long as the priest says

“I absolve you from your sins in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost” the confession is valid.

A good practice is to write down your sins on a piece of paper so that you will have an easier time remembering the sins you have committed. This can also be done by those who have no priest and who confess directly to God, in order to facilitate that your confession to Our Lord will be as exact as possible.

One could also make a confession of sins or heresies to any person or friend you feel you trust. This should generally be someone who is able to advice you on spiritual things, and not to any person you know.

Confessing our sins to each other, even though we cannot give absolution, is still a great tool to use in exposing the devil and in overcoming habitual bad habits or sins (reoccurring or habitual bad habits is in most cases what lead people to sin in the first place).

The Saints had as a habit to confess their sins daily, and thus we should try to act in this way as much as we are able. For confessing our sins daily, breeds humility.


1) Know and believe the basic catechism (i.e. the basic teachings) of the traditional Catholic Faith. PLEASE READ THE CATHECHISM NOW. One should also immediately begin to pray the Rosary each day. If you don’t know how, consult the How to Pray the Rosary section of our website. Always take time every day to read and study the Faith, and ask God for final perseverance.

[Note- Which Catechism? THE CATECHISM OF THE COUNCIL OF TRENT, which is available online, at the end of this letter.]

2) Hold belief in all the traditional dogmas of the Church and the correct Catholic positions against the post-Vatican II sect (covered in detail in our material), including, for example, the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation (without exception), the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Papacy, Papal Infallibility, the necessity of water baptism, etc.

3) Make the profession of faith for converts from the Council of Trent, which is below. If there is a specific sect to which you belonged, or if you believed in a specific heresy, a add at the end that you also reject that heretical sect or heresy. See the last section below: The Council of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts.

4) Have someone perform a conditional baptism using the conditional form of baptism given below. If there is any doubt about your baptism, this should be done.

5) After your conditional baptism, make a general confession to a non-heretical priest if one is available, mentioning all mortal and venial sins committed after your first possibly valid baptism that you can remember.

A good practice is to write down your sins on a piece of paper so that you will have an easier time remembering the sins you have committed. This can also be done by those who have no priest and who confess directly to God, in order to facilitate that your confession to Our Lord will be as exact as possible.

One could also make a confession of sins or heresies to any person or friend you feel you trust. This should generally be someone who is able to advice you on spiritual things, and not to any person you know.

Confessing our sins to each other, even though we cannot give absolution, is still a great tool to use in exposing the devil and in overcoming habitual bad habits or sins (reoccurring or habitual bad habits is in most cases what lead people to sin in the first place).

The Saints had as a habit to confess their sins daily, and thus we should try to act in this way as much as we are able, for confessing our sins daily, breeds humility.

People leaving the New Mass or adherence to the Vatican 2 Counter Church also need to make a confession (to a validly ordained and non-heretical priest, if one is available) that they attended a non-Catholic service and for however long they attended.

If they participated in other things at the New Mass (e.g. were a lay-minister, dressed immodestly, etc.) or accepted false ecumenism or denied some other dogma or if they practiced NFP, these things should also be mentioned in confession.

This must be done before receiving Communion at the Traditional Mass (if there is an acceptable one for you to attend in your area).

Those leaving the New Mass and adherence to the Vatican 2 false Church should also make that same profession of faith from the Council of Trent.

Skip over the next two sections (BAPTISM AND CONDITIONAL BAPTISM and BAPTISMAL VOWS), down to the last section:

The Council of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts: PROFESSION OF CATHOLIC FAITH.


The form of baptism is: “I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.” or “I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”

If there is some doubt about the validity of your baptism, the conditional form of baptism is:

“If you are baptized, I do not baptize you again, but if you are not yet baptized [pour water on the head, making sure it touches the skin] I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.”

Since there are barely any true Catholic priests in the whole country, you can have a Catholic friend perform a conditional baptism, and you can administer baptism to your own children.

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” 1439:

“In case of necessity, however, not only a priest or a deacon, but even a layman or woman, yes even a pagan and a heretic can baptize, so
long as he preserves the form of the Church and has the intention of doing what the Church does.”
(Denz. 696)


According to the Roman Ritual, at present in use, three questions are to be addressed to the person to be baptized, as follows:

"Dost thou renounce Satan? and all his works? and all his pomps?"
To each of these questions the person, or the sponsor in his name, replies:
"I do renounce".

The practice of demanding and making this formal renunciation seems to go back to the very beginnings of organized Christian worship. Tertullian among the Latins and St. Basil among the Greeks are at one in reckoning it as a usage which, although not explicitly warranted in the Scriptures, is nevertheless consecrated by a venerable tradition.

St. Basil says this tradition ascends from the Apostles. Tertullian, in his "De Coronâ", appears to hint at a twofold renunciation as common in his time, one which was made at the moment of baptism and another made sometime before, and publicly in the church, in the presence of the bishop. The form of this renunciation as found in the Apostolic Constitutions (VIII, 4) reads as follows:

"Let therefore the candidate for baptism declare thus in his renunciation: 'I renounce Satan and his works and his pomps and his worship and his angels and his inventions and all things that are under him'. And after his renunciation let him in his consociation say:

'And I associate myself to Christ and believe and am baptized into one unbegotten Being, the only true God Almighty, the Father of Christ, the Creator and Maker of all things, from whom are all things; and into the Lord Jesus Christ, His only begotten Son, the Firstborn of the whole creation, who before the ages was begotten by the good pleasure of the Father, by whom all things were made... I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and earth; and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, Our Lord; who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended into Hell; the third day He rose again from the dead; He ascended into Heaven, and sitteth at the right hand of God, the Father Almighty; from thence He shall come to judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen.

St. Justin Martyr testifies that baptism was only administered by those who, together with their profession of faith, made a promise or vow that they would live in conformity with the Christian code. Hence the generally employed formula: syntassomai soi, Christe,

"I surrender myself to thee, O Christ, to be ruled by thy precepts".

This took place directly over the apotaxis or renunciation of the devil, and was variously described by the Latins as promissum, pactum, and votum. During this declaration of attachment to Jesus Christ the person to be baptized turned towards the East as towards the region of light.

The practice of renewing the baptismal promises is more or less widespread. This is done under circumstances of special solemnity such as at the closing exercises of a mission, after the administration of First Communion to children, or the conferring of the Sacrament of Confirmation. It is thus intended as a way of reaffirming one's loyalty to the obligations taken over by membership in the Christian Church.

The Council of Trent’s Profession of Faith for Converts: PROFESSION OF CATHOLIC FAITH

Promulgated solemnly by Pope Pius IV and the Council of Trent

● I, N., with firm faith believe and profess each and every article contained in the symbol of faith which the holy Roman Church uses; namely:

● I believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; and in

● one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages; God from God, light from light, true God from true God; begotten not made, of one substance (consubstantial) with the Father, through whom all things were made;

● who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was made incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary, and was made man.

● He was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate, died, and was buried; and

● He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven;

● He sits at the right hand of the Father, and He shall come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and of His kingdom there will be no end.

● And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord, and giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son; who equally with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified; who spoke through the prophets.

● And I believe that there is one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church.

● I confess one baptism for the remission of sins; and I hope for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

● I resolutely accept and embrace the apostolic and ecclesiastical traditions and the other practices and regulations of that same Church.

● In like manner I accept Sacred Scripture according to the meaning which has been held by holy Mother Church and which she now holds. It is Her prerogative to pass judgment on the true meaning and interpretation of Sacred Scripture. And I will never accept or interpret it in a manner different from the unanimous agreement of the Fathers.

● I also acknowledge that there are truly and properly seven sacraments of the New Law, instituted by Jesus Christ our Lord, and that they are necessary for the salvation of the human race, although it is not necessary for each individual to receive them all.

● I acknowledge that the seven sacraments are: Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, Penance, Extreme Unction, Holy Orders, and Matrimony; and that they confer grace; and that of the seven, Baptism, Confirmation, and Holy Orders cannot be repeated without committing a sacrilege.

● I also accept and acknowledge the customary and approved rites of the Catholic Church in the solemn administration of these sacraments.

● I embrace and accept each and every article on Original Sin and Justification declared and defined in the most holy Council of Trent.

● I likewise profess that in Mass a true, proper, and propitiatory sacrifice is offered to God on behalf of the living and the dead, and that the Body and Blood together with the Soul and Divinity
of our Lord Jesus Christ is truly, really, and substantially present in the most holy Sacrament of the Eucharist, and that there is a change of the whole substance of the bread into the Body, and of the whole substance of the wine into the Blood; and this change the Catholic Church calls transubstantiation.

● I also profess that the whole and entire Christ and a true Sacrament is received under each separate species.

● I firmly hold that there is a purgatory, and that the souls detained there are helped by the prayers of the faithful.

● I likewise hold that the saints reigning together with Christ should be honored and invoked, that they offer prayers to God on our behalf, and that their relics should be venerated.

● I firmly assert that images of Christ, of the Mother of God ever Virgin, and of the other saints should be owned and kept, and that due honor and veneration should be given to them.

● I affirm that the power of indulgences was left in the keeping of the Church by Christ, and that the use of indulgences is very beneficial to Christians.

● I acknowledge the holy, Catholic, and apostolic Roman Church as the mother and teacher of all churches; and…

● I unhesitatingly accept and profess all the doctrines (especially those concerning the primacy of the Roman Pontiff and his infallible teaching authority) handed down, defined, and explained by the sacred canons and ecumenical councils and especially those of this most holy Council of Trent (and by the ecumenical Vatican Council I). And at the same time:

● I condemn, reject, and anathematize everything that is contrary to those propositions, and all heresies without exception that have been condemned, rejected, and anathematized by the Church.

● I, N., promise, vow, and swear that, with God’s help, I shall most constantly hold and profess this true Catholic faith, outside which no one can be saved and which I now freely profess and truly hold. With the help of God, I shall profess it whole and unblemished to my dying breath; and, to the best of my ability, I shall see to it that my subjects or those entrusted to me by virtue of my office hold it, teach it, and preach it. So help me God and His holy Gospel.


The End.

How old is the Priest at your Parish? Younger than 70, or so?

Our Catholic Priests were hi-jacked by Pope Paul 6th and made invalid, and Null and Void, on the advice and counsel of Protestants, on June 18, 1968, in Pope Paul VI's Pontificalis Romani, so that every person who was 'ordained' since then has no proper powers!

All of this is spelled out in the excellent Most Holy Family Monastery ( YouTube video below by Brother Michael Dimond and Brother Peter Dimond. The first section is about the faults of the Novus Ordo Mass, and the section on Ordination of Priests follows at 23:20, and the Ordination of Bishops at 33:30.


Nature abhors a vaccuum. As the Catholics Fall, the Muslims Rise.

(If you must, you may skip ahead past the first 3 minutes. Just Watch it.)

Source: Sensus Fidelium YouTube sermon.

What's Wrong with the World Today?

  • The Catholic Church has taught for centuries, and even in Catechism, that the Church would be strained by serious Apostasy, in the Last Days.

  • Satan has been trying to destroy the world for centuries, but in these Last Days, was granted by God, an extraordinary 100 year Reign of increased power. Most say it extends from about 1917 to 2017.

  • Satan used his powers, no doubt, in October, 1958, and at every Papal Election Conclave since. to hijack the Mass, the Catechism, and broad Church teachings, from the Vatican.

  • The Novus Ordo Mass, as it is known, (the Mass we all know since 1969), is a watered-down Mass, instituted by the Vatican Council II in 1969. Wholesale changes were made from the centuries old Latin Mass, eliminating many Prayers, to appease Protestants, in a flurry of Ecumenism. In 1570, Martin Luther eliminated 10 of the 12 most essential Prayers in the Offertory section of the Mass, so that the Mass would not be a Sacrifice. Those same 10 Offertory Prayers were eliminated from the Latin Mass in 1969, by Pope John Paul VI, and it became known as the 'New Order' Mass.

  • Most people, Catholics and Protestants included, think that nearly everyone goes to Heaven. No one ponders at a friend or relative's funeral whether or not the deceased might not actually be in Heaven already. Sins are so old-fashioned and no one goes to Confession anymore, Hell is just a myth, and TV Evalgelists offer Salvation, to those who only need to proclaim one time only, that they've accepted Jesus as their Savior.

What has happened to the Church, and the 'Faithful', since about 1962, and the Vatican Council II?

Seminarians are Down 90%

Ordinations are Down 71%

Catholic High Schools- Down 50%

Still be a Good Catholic and have an Abortion?    58% say Yes.

98% of Catholic Women have used Contraception at some point in their lives.

Only 19% of college age Catholics hold more Truth in Catholicism, rather than other religioins.

In 2005, the number of age 18-25 Cathoilcs who were 'highly committed' to the Roman catholic Church?    Zero Percent!

A 1996 St. Louis University Survey showed that 9% of all Nuns were sexually exploited by a Priest, Nun, or other Religious person.

Co-habitation is Up 1,000%

Can you still be a Good Catholic without attendingSunday Mass?    77% say Yes.

(Age 18-25) Still be a Good Catholic without Sunday Mass?    95% say Yes.

(Age 18-25) Catholics: Is Holy Communion merely symbolic? 70% say Yes.

In 2000, the number of Catholic Lay Elementary School teachers who did not accept the Divinity of Jesus as the Son of God?    9%

Marriage Annulments thru 2002 are up 148%.

The Magdelan Asylums of Ireland, opperated by Nuns,  exploited wayward women in slave labor 17 hours per day, until 1996.

Former Muslim Terrorist, Who Lived the Perfect Life of a Good Muslim, Sees Jesus in Prison, and Converts at Jesus' Feet!

There appears to be no Near Death Experience (NDE) Stories on YouTube of Muslims who saw Heaven, and were heading there. There are YouTube Videos of Muslim's NDEs, as well as those of Roman Catholic Priests, on my FollowThisSite Page Link below.

For long-time followers of this site there are wholesale changes to this site,starting 2017!

As shocking as it seams, I have changed my mind concerning the authentic validity of the Medjugorje Apparitions! I started this site only because of my 2006 'conversion', as a lapsed Catholic, after attending Medjugorje Visionary Ivan Dragicevic's talk in northern Rhode Island two days after Thanksgiving, 2006. I knew what I had to do, but it took me nearly years to go to Confession. I had only attended Mass about once or twice a year, and I knew that I had been Ridin the Hell Bound Train!   I knew that the Penance I was given in Confession was not enough, so I started this website, to make Reparation for my sins, and to save as many people as I could.

In spite of this, now the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, no doubt influenced by the Apostasy of the Catholic Church, would probably frown on this website. They issued a list to 'Ten Things to Know about Working for Christian Unity'. Here's Number Nine:

'...proselytism, or the deliberate targeting of another Christian or group of Christians for the sole purpose of getting them to reject their church to join another, is not allowed. Some people may feel called in conscience to change to another, but 'sheep stealing' is unacceptable."

In the USCCB's game of Sheep, it's not fair to 'steal sheep', since they're all in the same pen, and all of the sheep are going to Heaven anyway!

This may seam like a trivial matter to the uninformed Catholic who has no idea what has happened to the Catholic Church over the last 55 years, just as I was a year ago. Now, my eyes have been opened. This heretical statement above gets to the very heart of the matter. The Vatican Council Sect is all about one world religion- it doesn't matter what religion you are, or even if you hold to no religion at all- we can all be saved. They say that we are all brothers in Christ. Saint Pope John Paul II has taught that 'every man is Christ', and Pope Benedict XVI said, in his book, 'God in the World', (Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger), on Page 209, on the critical question of the Salvation of the Jews:

"It is, of course, possible to read the Old Testament so that it is not directed toward Christ; it does not point unequivocally to Christ. And if the Jews cannot see the promises as being fulfilled in him, this is not just ill will on their part, but genuinely because of the obscurity of the texts...There are perfectly good reasons, then for denying that the Old Testament refers to Christ and for saying, 'No, that is not what he said', and there are also good reasons for referring it to him- that is what the dispute between the Jews and Christians is about."

Pope Francis, in a speech to a group of Lutherans, on the 99th Anniversary of the 'Miracle of the Sun' at Fatima, said on October 13, 2016:

"It is not licit to convince them of your faith. Proselytism is the strongest venom against the ecumenical path."

Mark 16:15-16   "And He [Jesus] said to them, "Go into all the world and proclaim the Gospel to the whole creation. Whoever believes and is baptized, will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned."

Pope Francis is preaching a New Gospel.

Galatians 1:9  "As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!"


I have decided to eliminate all supporting information concerning Medjugorje. This is a is a serious decision, and one that I must make. I hope that my visitors to this website also reconsider their choice concerning Medjugorje. 

Over the years, I only wondered whether Medjugorje Visionary Vicka would publish her promised book detailing the earthly life of Our blessed Mother. I have slowly been loosing patience, and I have recently read enough other details that convince me that the apparitions are not genuine! 

Go to my Medjugorje Debunked page Button below, to investigate: 

I am no longer a believer in 'The Rapture', or the 1,000 year Millennium Reign of Jesus on Earth, following the Apocalypse!

This site will, from now on, only support the Teachings of the Catholic Church, which states that there is no Pre-Trib, Mid-Trib, or Post-Trib Rapture, and Jesus will not Rule on Earth, for a Millennium. 

I will rely on the teachings of a very firm and excellent Priest's End Times Sermons on YouTube. Go to my Sensus Fidelium YouTubeVideo page:

First of all, It really doesn't matter in which time, or Century, you live. There is a plan for all of us, and if you live it out to the best of your ability, that is exactly what God intended for you. 

What is the meaning of life? To live the the best life you can, and most important, 

So, your job is to get to Heaven, and God knew you before the world was created. Life on Earth in my opinion, is just one big filter, to find the Good, Holy Souls worthy of Heaven, because Forever is a very long time!

After a few hundred years in Heaven, the lowly concerns of Earth will seam so incredibly petty to you, once you're  in Heaven. 

There are only two signs of the Apocalypse.

The two real signs of the Apocalypse are the 'Great Apostacy', and the appearance of the AntiChrist. The definition of 'Apostasy' is the abandonment or renunciation of a religious or political belief. 


In the real world, Apostasy as we know it today, is not so dramatic as the renunciation of one's religious beliefs. Religious beliefs will be, (are), abandoned today, but it is largely going on unnoticed.

Satan's 100 year Reign:

Satan was granted a period of time with strong powers, as prophesied by Pope Leo XIII, on October 13, 1884. Most people accept that it was 100 years, and that it began in 1917, since the date corresponds with the 'Miracle of the Sun' at Fatima, on October 13, 1917. With these powers, Satan has been wrecking havoc in the 20th and 21st Centuries. Apostasy is his primary goal, as we have seen, when people deny that most evil things are actually not sins.

Where did Confession go?

Sunday Mass attendance, and the number of Parishes is declining, while those who attend Mass, and receive Holy Communion, seldom go to Confession. In many Parishes, Confession, (also known as Reconciliation), is limited to a 15 or 30 minute period on a weekday afternoon, making it very hard for a working person to go to Confession. On the other hand, more convenient hours would probably be established, if there was sufficient demand. 

If a person believes that nearly everyone goes to Heaven, especially those in good families, who drive their kids to soccer practice, and refrain from viciously criticizing other's Facebook posts, then there's not much to worry about. 

If one believes that only the worst offences keep someone out of Heaven, they probably feel pretty comfortable. 

If a person repeated long-ago, with a Sunday morning TV preacher, a belief in Jesus, that He died for our sins, and they've accepted Him as their Personal Savior, they probably now believe that they've already had their Ticket punched. After all, it worked for the Repentant Thief, who was crucified with Jesus! 

Listen to what Fr. Stephen Scheier, whose video is also on my NearDeathExperiences (NDE) page, has to say about what's wrong with the Church today, because the first thing is Confession:

Most of us won't pass through the Narrow Gate. "...For behold, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last."

He [Jesus] passed through towns and villages, teaching as He went and making His way to Jerusalem.

Someone asked Him, "Lord, will only a few people be saved?"

He answered them,"Strive to enter through the narrow gate, for many, I tell you, will attempt to enter but will not be strong enough. After the Master of the House has arisen and locked the door, then you will stand outside knocking and saying, 'Lord, open the door for us.' He will say to you in reply, 'I do not know where you are from.' And you will say, 'We ate and drank in Your company and You taught in our streets.' Then He will say to you, 'I do not know where [you] are from. Depart from me, all you evildoers!'

And there will be wailing and grinding of teeth when you see Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and all the prophets in the Kingdom of God, and yourselves cast out.

And people will come from the east and the west and from the north and the south and will recline at table in the Kingdom of God.

For behold, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last." (Luke 13:22-30) 

How many of us go to Heaven?  One Third, (33 Percent)? 

In all the land, says the LORD, two thirds of them will be cut off, and one third shall be left. (Zechariah 13:8) 

How many of us go to Heaven?  Ten Percent?  90% of us may be shut out of Heaven's Narrow Gate! 

As He [Jesus] continued His journey to Jerusalem, He traveled through Samaria and Galilee. As He was entereing a village, ten leppers met (Him). They stood at a distance from Him and raised their voice, saying, "Jesus, Master! Have pity on us!" And when He saw them, He said, "Go show yourselves to the priests." As they were going, they were cleansed. And one of them, realizing he had been healed, returned, Glorifying God in a loud voice: and he fell at the feet of Jesus and thanked Him. He was a Samaritan, Jesus said in reply, "Ten were cleansed were they not? Where are the other nine? Has none but this foreigner returned to give thanks to God?" Then He said to him, "Stand up and go; your faith has saved you." (Luke 17:11-19) 

How many of us go to Heaven?  Maybe it's only  One Percent! 

Gideon had been reluctant to accept leadership of the Israelite army (Judges 6:36-40). But when assured of God’s direction, he took up the task. Gideon knew that he did not have the ability to defeat the Midianites. He had faith that the Lord would help him do it. 

32,000 men [some say 30,000] joined Gideon’s army. They were a small army compared with the Midianite army. The Midianite army was 135,000 or more [some say 65,000, and some say 120,000] (Judges 8:10). Even though the odds were stacked in the Midianites favour, the Lord told Gideon that the Israelite army was too big. If the Israelites won with 32,000 men, they might think they won because of their great abilities or strategy. The Lord wanted to make sure they knew that the victory was only because of His strength. To demonstrate His power, God significantly decreased Gideon’s fighting force. He told Gideon to allow any man to go home if he was afraid. Twenty-two thousand men went home. 

There were only 10,000 men left to fight the 135,000 Midianites. Again, the Lord said that there were too many and instructed Gideon in how to decrease the size of the group. All of the men followed Gideon down to the water to drink. Almost all of the men got down on their knees to drink from the water. But 300 of them remained standing but bent down to scoop up the water and lap it from their hands. These 300 men who lapped the water like a dog remained in Gideon’s army. If 300 soldiers could defeat an army of 135,000 then God would have to be on their side. 

Gideon divided his men into three groups and surrounded the enemy. The men were equipped with trumpets and lighted torches hidden in clay pitchers. At about ten o’clock at night (the beginning of the middle watch; see Judges 7:19), Gideon and his army attacked. At Gideon’s signal all the men broke the pitchers, waved the torches, and blew the trumpets. Between trumpet blasts they shouted their battle cry. 

Most of the enemy soldiers were sleeping in preparation for battle the next day. When they heard the trumpets blowing and the pitchers shattering all around them, revealing the three hundred torches, the Midianites must have thought they were surrounded by hordes of Israelites. God used the resulting confusion to cause the Midianites to defeat themselves!

300 is 1% of the original 30,000 

"...neither will they be persuaded if someone should rise from the dead."

There was a rich man who dressed in purple garments and fine linen and dined sumptuously each day.

And lying at his door was a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who would have gladly eaten his fill of the scraps that fell from the rich man's table.

Dogs even used to come and lick his sores. When the poor man died, he was carried away by angels to the bosom of Abraham.

The rich man also died and was buried, and from the netherworld, where he was in torment, he raised his eyes and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus at his side.

And he cried out, 'Father Abraham, have pity on me. Send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am suffering torment in these flames.'

Abraham replied, 'My child, remember that you received what was good during your lifetime and Lazarus likewise received what was bad; but now he is comforted here, whereas you are tormented.

Moreover, between us and you a great chasm is established to prevent anyone from crossing who might want to go from our side to yours or your side to ours,'

He said, 'Then I beg you, father, send him to my father's house, for I have five brothers, so that he may warn them, lest they too come to this place of torment.'

But Abraham replied, 'They have Moses and the prophets. Let them listen to them.'

He said, 'Oh no, father Abraham, but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.'

Then Abraham said, 'If they will not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone should rise from the dead.'" (Luke 16:19-31) 

[Charles Dickens' A Christmes Carol is based on this passage.]

Hit Counters
Web Site Hit Counters


free templates
Make a Free Website with Yola.